Our Constitution -Supremacy Of God , Rule OF Law (Not BY Law)—Dr. Charles Lugosi ‘s Speech At Reclaim Canada Conference —Victoria , BC —May 28, 29, 2022

The Origin of Canada’s Rule of Law
© Dr. Charles I. M. Lugosi, SJD May 28, 2022

Today I will discuss with you the rule of law and its origins in the common law.

I will define for you the meaning of the rule of law, and its imitator, rule by law, also known as legalism.
I will discuss how the emergence of positive law derived from legalism, replaced natural law, which is the guardian of the rule of law, and opened the door to the replacement of the authentic rule of law with rule by laws, that is disguised in the name of the rule of law.

How do we know when society is governed by the authentic rule of law, and not its pretender?

A brief history of the common law, focusing on the features of the authentic rule of law as seen through the eyes of legal scholars and jurists, teaches us the truth.

History reveals over time, how the moral foundation of law was rejected and replaced by immoral political objectives, implemented by political parties and by some of their many appointed judges.

Source of the Common Law

The source of the common law is found in religion, and submission to the supremacy of God.
In the case of Western societies, the Law was given by God to the Jewish people in the content of the Ten Commandments.
The Law of God, established the laws of Jewish society and this Law later became the foundation of Western Christian Civilization.
The basic principles of the Law set out in the Ten Commandments serve as the Constitution between God and God’s people.
The Law is religious and moral in origin. Civil law cannot be separated from the Law. Morality cannot be divorced from the Law.
The Law reveals, establishes and declares what is moral, just and right, applying equally to all people in society, for no one is above the Law.
The Law discriminates between what is moral and immoral; right from wrong; good from bad; and, truth from lies.
Any transgression of the Law is an offense against God. The Law demands unqualified obedience, in all circumstances.
The Law is an absolute unchanging moral order to which people must conform. It is not negotiable. As a whole, the Law has coherent integrity and consistency.
Education in the Law is mandatory to ensure compliance with the Law.
Application of the Law to specific cases developed a body of case law common to all – the common law.

Civil society exercises power to enforce the Law. The use of fair proportionate force protects the Law and society from anarchy and lawlessness.
The common law is founded upon and infused with Judeo-Christian morality inherent in the Law.
The history of the common law and its development suggests that the conception of justice inherited by Canada and the United States of America from England is the Judeo-Christian teaching of love.

For example, in Donoghue v. Stevenson, Lord Atkin took the Christian commandment to “love your neighbor as yourself” as a legal duty extending a duty of care to one’s neighbor. To be negligent and cause harm to your neighbor merited damages in a products liability case. From the source of the Law, the common law of negligence was discovered, formulated and applied as a principle of justice.
Principles of justice are thus discoverable by judges in the common law and are derived from the Judeo-Christian commandment of love.

The Judeo-Christian religions have always stressed the importance of absolute truth. God’s word is truth, and the Law is truth.
To establish truth and justice in a country, there must be the rule of law founded upon a religious and moral foundation.

Lord Alfred Denning, considered by many to be the greatest English jurist in the past century, observed:
“Religion concerns the spirit in man whereby he is able to recognize what is truth and what is justice; whereas law is only the application, however imperfectly, of truth and justice in our everyday affairs. If religion perishes in the land, truth and justice will also.”

In his Letter from the Birmingham Jail, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. stated: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly. . . .
[T]here are two types of laws: There are just and there are unjust laws. I would agree with Saint Augustine that “An unjust law is no law at all.” . . . .
Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine when a law is just or unjust?

A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.”

St. Thomas Aquinas distinguished between just and unjust laws that either conformed to the natural law, or were corruption of the law:

“Human law is law inasmuch as it is in conformity with right reason and thus derives from the eternal law. But when law is contrary to reason, it is called an unjust law; but in this case it ceases to be a law and becomes instead an act of violence. . . . Every law made by man can be called a law insofar as it derives from the natural law.

But if it is somehow opposed to the natural law, then it is really not a law but rather a corruption of the law.”
Thomas Aquinas believed when a law is contrary to reason it is unjust and lacks moral authority. If a law is “at variance with natural law, it will not be law, but spoilt law.”

Lord Denning, the longest ever serving judge of the English Court of Appeal observed, “[a]lthough religion, law and morals can be separated, they are nevertheless still very much dependent on each other. Without religion there can be no morality: and without morality there can be no law.”
We can now define the meaning of the phrase, the “rule of law.” The Rule of Law

I define the “rule of law” as life in a society governed by inherently just moral laws sourced from the Law given by God, where the people are submissive and obedient to the supremacy of God. Life under the “rule of law” means to live in a free and democratic society that honors God’s commands, abiding by absolute standards of right and wrong, and a society characterized by willful obedience to truth, justice and righteousness. Constitutional limits are placed on the power of government, to permanently protect the freedoms of conscience, religion, and morality from infringement. Authentic rule of law ensures equality, for no one individual or faction is above the law. All human beings, at all stages of life, from conception to natural death, have equal absolute inalienable rights to life, liberty and security of the person. The powers of the government is limited. All branches of government, whether executive, legislative, or judicial, are under the law, and accountable to moral and constitutional scrutiny to ensure conformity with the authentic rule of law. Justice, truth, freedom and democracy are the hallmarks of the rule of law.

Legalistic “Rule by Law” under the False Misleading Label of the Rule of Law

“Rule by law” is the antithesis of the “rule of Law,” It functions as a society that is governed by legalism. The source of rule by law in today’s Western society is human reasoning that advances political goals that evolve with changing values. The laws of this society reflect a secular humanistic cluster of beliefs that breeds totalitarianism, fail to accommodate minorities, impose identity politics, fosters intolerance and promotes idolatrous self-love. These collective beliefs undermine democracy, and are perpetuated by censorship practiced by the ruling class of big tech (including Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Twitter) educators (universities, colleges, high schools), lawmakers, mainstream political parties, biased enriched media, and woke corporations, all of which to various extent, purge, cancel and prosecute dissenters with tools like hate speech laws, human rights laws, criminal laws, imprisonment, segregation, and infliction of financial harm. In this society, there are no absolute standards of right and wrong, but moral relativism.

This secular regime is empowered by positive law and social conditioning through propaganda. Society is characterized by coerced deferential obedience to legalism falsely labelled as the rule of law. Morality is divorced from law. Inequality pervades society. Legal fiction replaces truth, so people live by lies. God is no longer the source of law. The supremacy of God is not honored.

Common features to both kinds of legal regimes, are laws and judicial opinions that are accessible, known, certain, clear, and of prospective, not retrospective application. The main distinguishing difference between the two regimes is the presence or the absence of humble deference to the supremacy of God, and whether or not the branches of government obeys and enforces the authentic rule of law.

The Corruption of the Rule of Law

God’s laws that were once embedded in the common law and in jurisprudence have become relics, or fossils, replaced by laws and judicial decisions derived solely from human philosophy and rational reasoning. Court decisions now legitimize immoral conduct forbidden by the Law.

Canada’s Constitution proclaims in its Preamble to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms that this nation’s source of law is the supremacy of God, and that the government is under the authority of the authentic rule of law. The reality is that the Canadian government is atheist, for the principles set out in the Preamble are replaced by a rule by law society, where humanism prevails and God, truth and justice are lost.

In this struggle between the righteous who fight for the rule of law and the supremacy of God, and those who fight for rule by law, there will arise issues that are so controversial that this nation has become divided and is beginning to crumble from within. Today, the very existence of Canada is at stake.

Defend the Constitution

We have reached a point in time when the abandonment of the authentic rule of law over the past decades has created a crisis that results in the rejection of historic moral values and Canada’s Judeo- Christian heritage. Having experienced coerced obedience to the government, Canadians intuitively know that something is very wrong and have struggled to articulate the reason why. It is the turning away from the supremacy of God and the substitution of rule by law for the authentic rule of law that is the root cause of our constitutional crisis. It is imperative that we defend the Constitution of Canada, and actively become involved in politics and the law.

We are gathered here to restore national unity and to help you understand why the battle to include the precious phrases found in the Preamble to the Charter of Rights, “the rule of law” and the “supremacy of God,” are foundational to Canada’s entire Constitution. What you learn today is essential to properly interpreting the entire Constitution and to know why this nation has de facto segregation and is on the brink of losing its sovereignty.

It is our responsibility to save Canada’s Constitution and to choose judges and political leaders who understand what you learned today, and will restore the rule of law and the supremacy of God.

PLAYER

INDEX PAGE 1

      ​

CLICK HERE FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

Index Page 1

CLICK IMAGE BELOW TO VIEW OUR FEATURED BROADCASTERS 

Justice is the collective thought of righteousness; mercy is its personal expression. Justice is the function of the Group

If one man craves freedom -- liberty -- he must remember that all other men long for the same freedom. Groups of such liberty-loving mortals cannot live together in peace without becoming subservient to such laws, rules, and regulations as will grant each person the same degree of freedom while at the same time safeguarding an equal degree of freedom for all of his fellow mortals. If one man is to be absolutely free, then another must become an absolute slave. And the relative nature of freedom is true socially, economically, and politically. Freedom is the gift of civilization made possible by the enforcement of LAW.

[player url="https://rumble.com/embed/vkqv7k/?pub=4" title="Dr. David Martin Is Dan Happels Guest Tuesday October 5th 2021"]

[player url="https://www.constitutionalrightscentre.ca/" title="welcome | Constitutional Rights Law Centre" summary="MiIiSiSiIiOiN  SiTiAiTiEiMiEiNiT Whereas Canada lacks a politically free and financially independent institute for the advancement of constitutional right(s) and upholding the supremacy of the Constitution over the Executive and Legislative and..."]

[player url="https://brandnewtube.com/watch/australian-attorney-files-lawsuit-against-government_suuw3jndY4qhTeH.html" title="Australian Attorney Files Lawsuit Against Government" summary="⁣Matthew Hopkins is an Australian attorney who has filed an historic lawsuit in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The lawsuit targets the tyrants responsible for implementing the New World Order down under, the proto"]

[player url="https://www.bitchute.com/video/ST7fudl0zYlN/" title="Vax Lawsuits Being Filed, Soon Dominoes Will Fall (8-23-2021)" summary="Lawsuits are being filed by Deters Law against the 6 largest Tri-State Healthcare Systems today. (8-23-2021) For The Cincinnati, Ohio, USA (Tri-State) area, the lawsuits will first be against the 6 largest Tri-State Healthcare Systems which gathe…"]

[player url="https://www.constitutionalrightscentre.ca/" title="welcome | Constitutional Rights Law Centre" summary="MiIiSiSiIiOiN  SiTiAiTiEiMiEiNiT Whereas Canada lacks a politically free and financially independent institute for the advancement of constitutional right(s) and upholding the supremacy of the Constitution over the Executive and Legislative and..."]

[player url="https://www.jccf.ca/" title="Legal Advocacy in Canada | Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms" summary="We are a Canadian legal advocacy organization that defends citizens’ fundamental freedoms under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, through pro bono legal representation and through educating Canadians about the free society."]

[player url="https://rumble.com/embed/vfmt47/?pub=45npx" title="REVEALED: How Globalists Planned the Covid-19 Pandemic for 10 Years"]

INDEX PAGE 1

      ​

CLICK HERE FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

Index Page 1

CLICK IMAGE BELOW TO VIEW OUR FEATURED BROADCASTERS 

Global Pandemic Hoax - Crimes Against Humanity committed by global elite thinktank's who have embedded themselves behind the United Nations and its controlling organizations governed by unelected dictators who have rolled out an attempted coup d'état against many governments of the world in a planned Global Reset by political dictators committing treason against the nations as they now rule through political tyranny - economic slavery and a militarized police state. 

If one man craves freedom -- liberty -- he must remember that all other men long for the same freedom. Groups of such liberty-loving mortals cannot live together in peace without becoming subservient to such laws, rules, and regulations as will grant each person the same degree of freedom while at the same time safeguarding an equal degree of freedom for all of his fellow mortals. If one man is to be absolutely free, then another must become an absolute slave. And the relative nature of freedom is true socially, economically, and politically. Freedom is the gift of civilization made possible by the enforcement of LAW.

 Religion makes it spiritually possible to realize the brotherhood of men, but it will require mankind government to regulate the social, economic, and political problems associated with such a goal of human happiness and efficiency.

[player url="https://brandnewtube.com/v/AIhwPv" title="Catherine Austin Fitts Entrevista completa Bloqueo del Planeta - Catherine Austin Fitts Full Intervi" summary="⁣Catherine Austin Fitts Entrevista completa Bloqueo del Planeta - Catherine Austin Fitts Full Interview Planet Lockdown2"]

[player url="https://rumble.com/vdam7d-the-great-reset-explained-in-5-minutes.html" title="The Great Reset explained in 5 minutes" summary="How do you destroy the value of fossil fuels then destroy the independent middle classes, then take full technocratic control of the world? You first warn of carbon emissions causing global cooling, t"]

"If one man craves freedom -- liberty -- he must remember that all other men long for the same freedom. Groups of such liberty-loving mortals cannot live together in peace without becoming subservient to such laws, rules, and regulations as will grant each person the same degree of freedom while at the same time safeguarding an equal degree of freedom for all of his fellow mortals. If one man is to be absolutely free, then another must become an absolute slave. And the relative nature of freedom is true socially, economically, and politically. Freedom is the gift of civilization made possible by the enforcement of LAW."

2020-11-20 GO TO SOURCE 

“PCR-Test cannot determine corona. A doctor is needed to explain the disease. Quarantines abolished. ” say the judges.

In addition, quarantines will be abolished immediately and the PCR test is no longer valid. Only doctors are allowed to make the diagnosis.

The judges have enough evidence that the PCR is almost always false positive or false negative.

That is the ruling of the Lisbon Court of Appeal in Ponta Delgada and several judges in the country.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t1b01H0Jd4hsMU7V1vy70yr8s3jlBedr/view
The Lisbon Court of Appeal states that a PCR test cannot establish a valid diagnosis of Covid-19.

"Only a doctor can diagnose this or any other disease.", say two judges from the court's 3rd criminal division. (source)

On August 20, 4 German persons were MANDATORY put in quarantine. Even then, a judge in Ponta Delgada ruled that this was “illegal deprivation of liberties” and they had to be released IMMEDIATELY on August 27. (source)

In the specific case, the four tourists were never contacted by telephone in their language, let alone a doctor "Which is frankly inexplicable given the alleged severity of the infection", underlines the verdict.

Apart from the quarantines of the four Germans, these isolations also happened at the national level. These too have been declared illegal (source)

“Politicians do not decide who will be quarantined for medical reasons. Only a doctor can recommend it and a judge can assign it. ”

This amounts to illegal imprisonment

"No one can be declared ill or dangerous to health by decree or law, not even as an automatic administrative consequence of the result of a laboratory test, regardless of the type."

A medical diagnosis is a medical act for which only a doctor is legally authorized and for which that doctor is solely and fully responsible. No other person or institution, including any government agency or court, has such authority. It is not the job of the regional health authority to declare someone sick or dangerous. Only a doctor can do this. No one can be declared ill or dangerous to health by decree or law, not even as an automatic administrative consequence of the result of a laboratory test, regardless of the type. (source)

The court wondered since when is it up to a court or politicians to make clinical diagnoses, on their own initiative and based on the final results of a test (proven unreliable)?

“Since when is the diagnosis of a disease made by decree or by law? Since the applicant has more than one duty to notify, a diagnosis is a medical act and therefore the sole responsibility of a doctor. ”

Politicians and health institutions have no right to take away freedoms

The judge says about this: "You may be in isolation if this measure is determined by the health authority when you have been diagnosed with COVID 19 and if the attending physician assesses you and says you do not need hospitalization". The government is therefore excluded from this and should not have any say in this. (source)

“And even then, the health authority does not have the power to take away someone's freedoms. A doctor or health institution can diagnose the disease, but it is still up to the judge to recommend isolation. ”

"The standards invoked by the GGD, which supported the applicants' deprivation of liberty through a report of prophylactic isolation, are non-binding administrative guidelines for applicants", they argue in the judgment. In other words: isolation or other measures imposed by a doctor or a medical administrative entity is not binding, only an advice that can be reviewed by the judge.

This is the same ruling as that of the various Azores courts of first instance issued habeas corpus in other cases, as well as the ruling used by the Constitutional Court in an identical case, in which it considered mandatory quarantine for tourists in the region as a illegal detention. (source)

Judges at Ratton Palace say this is imposing isolation “is in no way justified because it looks like a short prison sentence with perhaps even more serious measures than a convicted offender. Prisoners are still allowed to play sports. People in isolation are not, is one of the examples added by the judges. ”

PCR Test Illegal Way to Determine Corona

This judgment would huge legal implications Portugal have to have. The PCR test is an unrecognized way of detecting Corona, and so a body that requires people to isolate themselves is guilty of “wrongful imprisonment”.

The It is also to be expected that courts in other EU countries could also use these judgments as an opportunity to address the scientific basis that was decisive for these judgments.

Interesting: As we can see from the development of the pandemic in Italy, it was only the PCR tests and subsequent official measures leading to a massive increase in deaths, both with and without infection. Covid-19 diseases and SARS infections have been diagnosed in Italy from summer 2019 long before it was known what it was. (source) (source)

The can now be expected that courts in other EU countries will have to take over these rulings.

This as an opportunity to address the scientific basis that was decisive for these statements. 

Ex-Pfizer Chief Science Officer criticizes the PCR test and suspects immunity

PCR test results are a created illusion and group immunity has presumably been built up for a long time. (source)

This can be seen in the number of deaths who die from Corona. Negligible and only a final push for mostly elderly people with serious conditions.

Dr. Mike Yeadon, 16 years Vice President and Chief Science Officer at my pharmaceutical giant Pfizer , is adopted that half or even “almost all” of the tests for COVID were false positive. Yeadon also argued that the herd immunity threshold is much lower and that it up to now far could have been achieved and has already been achieved in many countries.  (source)

COVID survival rate has now risen to 99,8%

The survival rate from COVID-19 has risen to 99,8% of infections since May. This is close to the common flu, with a survival rate of 99,9%. While COVID can have serious after-effects, the flu or another respiratory illness can also have serious consequences. (source)

Additional sources:
https://tkp.at/2020/11/17/portugiesisches-berufungsgericht-haelt-pcr-tests-fuer-unzuverlaessig-und-hebt-quarantaene-auf/
https://www.uticaphoenix.net/2020/11/17/portuguese-appeals-court-deems-pcr-tests-unreliable/

This is the statement and you will have to make do with it.

DONATE TO COMMON SENSE TV

2020-11-20 GO TO SOURCE