Michael Tracey

It’s not often that I’d feel compelled to share a full reader email. I get a lot of emails… and let’s just say the quality can vary.

But here’s an extremely high-quality email that’s worth reproducing. It comes in response to an article of mine from last week about the media’s unshakable obsession with partisanship in relation to the phenomenon of “vaccine hesitancy.” Glance at most popular coverage of the issue and you’d come away thinking that Republican voting inclination is the only relevant variable in why millions of Americans are “hesitant” to take COVID vaccines.

I don’t know about you, but my hunch when examining vaccine uptake data from around the country has long been that socioeconomic status — or, to put it more simply, class — is a highly salient factor, perhaps even dwarfing partisanship. And while race also does get mentioned a fair amount — among racial groups, blacks have the lowest predilection to get vaccinated — whatever racial disparities exist could easily be more a function of socioeconomic status than any intrinsically “racial” factor.

Issues of class tend to be less exciting than race and partisanship for the media to bicker amongst themselves about though, so it’s unsurprising that this would be mostly glossed over. And it should go without saying that the vast majority of people who work in the media/nonprofit/activism complex come from a very distinct socioeconomic stratum, hence why they often miss trends that derive from lower-class sensibilities with which they are unfamiliar, and seldom ever encounter.

The letter-writer below asked to remain anonymous for reasons that will become obvious once you begin reading. But most relevantly, he/she has direct firsthand experience with disparate vaccine uptake rates among differing socioeconomic groups, and proffers a theory explaining these disparities. The context here is a corporate one, but the dynamics referenced strike me as universalizable enough to potentially account for a large degree of overall “vaccine hesitancy.” And yet what he/she’s getting at is essentially never considered in US media squabbles.

I wouldn’t necessarily endorse every aspect of the conclusions proposed, but I endorse the worthiness of airing the opinion. Emails like this make the more “unkind” feedback I receive worth it!

Hey Michael,

Wanted to write to you to share an observation. It could well make for a worthwhile story, should you choose to pursue it, or maybe it’s something you could file in your mental knowledge rolodex for future use. Or maybe it’s useless and I’m wasting my time — if nothing else, I get to put my thoughts on paper. Please do not ever share my personal information, who I work for, locations where I work, or any other information that could possibly be used to identify me.

I am what is called a [REDACTED] for [FORTUNE 500 COMPANY] working in the supply chain domain; this includes manufacturing, logistics, and distribution.  If you share any of this information, please do not share my job title, name, or company. My job is to work with high-level company executives to understand their overall corporate strategy ($300k+ annual types), then with low-level distribution center and factory workers ($12-$15 an hour types) to understand their day-to-day jobs — and then deliver complex, multi-dimensional technology solutions that execute on those strategic goals while making life easier for floor workers. I really cut across income levels every day.

I also make a point of presenting an unassuming persona that has much to learn and is highly curious — this generally signals to the majority of people I work with that they can both a) impart their knowledge willingly to me and b) more importantly, speak candidly. In order to know what I need to deliver in a technology solution, I must understand the needs of the affected parties up and down the corporate ladder. This method of communication has proven effective in getting people to open up about what’s important to them, what’s challenging in their day-to-day jobs, and what they think would make the operation better in some way.

Oftentimes, this unassuming persona is also disarming in a way that seems to make people feel comfortable sharing personal thoughts and stories with me, well beyond anything work-related. I’ve had C-suite executives open up to me about booze and weed fueled nights of scandalous behavior on work trips, and hourly laborers open up to me about dying relatives and 9/11 conspiracy theories. I take pride in listening and in not betraying their trust. As a result, I believe (perhaps arrogantly) that I am uniquely positioned to make observations about both groups of people. I think this is unique because it is a largely non-political arena; most of these people’s primary concern is not what a Democrat or Republican said that day, but things like how to make sure the operation is maximally efficient or how to make sure (as an hourly associate) he or she doesn’t have to stay late that evening.

I have noticed, with absolute clarity, a stark divide in vaccination behavior. I hop around between my home in [REDACTED] to our facilities in the South, Midwest, and on the West Coast. I can tell you that at each site, the picture is the exact same. [FORTUNE 500 COMPANY] has a program where you can shed the standard COVID protocols if you provide the company with your proof of vaccination.

Without fail, corporate management and executives are vaccinated at near 100% rates. Likewise without fail, hourly laborers (who are almost all white in the Midwest, almost all black in the South, and all mixed up on the West Coast) are vaccinated between 5% and 15% — and vaccinations are concentrated almost entirely in the old folks.

I have heard over and over that this is a political phenomenon. “Vaccine hesitancy is a problem of white Republicans, of course!” 

But in reality, I don’t believe it has anything to do with race or political alignment — and everything to do with social class.

I read somewhere recently a tweet from someone who seemed insightful, who said that the centers of power in this country have so heavily relied on propaganda and psyops that the hierarchies that run those centers of power have themselves begun to select for people that are most likely to buy into the propaganda.

As a result, you don’t have an evil ruling class — just a delusional one that is entirely bought into its own narrative. The people who do not move up the ladder — though they may be competent and capable — are restricted by the fact that they do not buy the narrative.

If this is true, I think it makes absolute sense.

The people who are most likely to be “company men” — the people whose entire lives are defined by their status in a Fortune 500 organization, who are the most married to the corporate narrative, and who are the most likely to be absent critical thought (as all executives are — once you get to VP, you stop thinking your own thoughts and instead think only your shareholders’ or board’s thoughts) are the ones who are, almost universally, vaccinated.

The people who do not live in that world are, almost universally, not.  

I have not seen one person break it down this way. I bet if you spent a week or two digging into the research on this, you’d see just how true it was in all of the numbers available to you.

Anyways — if that’s not worth your time, then no sweat. You seem like the kind of guy who would have an interest in this, though.

What I really like about this email is that it cuts through all the typical narrative gamesmanship and lands on something — spurred by this person’s direct personal experience — that has been largely unremarked upon in the whole “vaccine hesitancy” debate. If getting the vaccine burnishes your place within a corporate hierarchy, or some other institutional hierarchy of which you are apart, then of course you’re going to be more likely to get the vaccine.

But if you have essentially no hope of ascending a corporate/institutional hierarchy, and little investment in your “corporate culture” at all — because you ultimately experience it as a menial job to make ends meet — then of course you’re going to be less likely to get the vaccine. Makes total sense. Thus, “vaccine hesitancy” would seem to correlate with the strength of one’s institutional attachments.

Put another way, if you’re highly attached to an institution that prioritizes vaccination, then the effect on your uptake behavior is obvious. If you have no strong attachment to whatever institution you exist within — or even disdain said institution — then the behavioral effects are similarly obvious. You might even decline vaccination as a subtle “F you” to that institution.

Of course, it depends on the institution. Some less “mainstream” institutions may actually disincentivize vaccination. But that’s generally not going to be the case at a Fortune 500 company.

Importantly, the writer notes that according to his/her observations, this dynamic appears to transcend racial lines.

The person who sent me this email certainly isn’t infallible, and maybe others have contradictory observations. Either way, it calls for further inquiry and I’ll try to do that journalistically in the weeks ahead.

You can always email me at mtracey@substack.com or mtracey@protonmail.com (for a more secure line.) Constructive observations preferred, but you can also feel free to tell me I’m a piece of crap.

By Brandon Smith
Alt-Markert.us
March 13, 2021

I suspect a large portion of the public is at least partially aware when they are being pushed or lured into a specific way of thinking. We have certainly had enough experience with institutions trying to manage our thoughts over the years.  Governments and mainstream media outlets in particular have made the manufacture of public consent their top priority. This is what they spend most of their time, money and energy on. All other issues are secondary.

The media does not objectively report facts and evidence, it spins information to plant an engineered narrative in the minds of its viewers. But the public is not as stupid as they seem to think. This is probably why trust in the media has plunged by 46% in the past ten years, hitting an all time low this year of 27%.

Except for pre-election season spikes, mainstream outlets from CNN to Fox to CBS to MSNBC are facing dismal audience numbers, with only around 2 million to 3 million prime time viewers. There are numerous YouTube commentators with bigger audiences than this. And, if you sift through the debris of MSM videos on YouTube, you’ll find low hits and a majority of people that are visiting their channels just to make fun of them.Immunity Boost Supplem...Buy New $24.99 ($0.28 / Count)(as of 03:49 EDT - Details)

The MSM is now scrambling to explain their crumbling empire, as well as debating on ways to save it from oblivion. The power of the “Fourth Estate” is a facade, an illusion given form by smoke and mirrors. Bottom line: Nobody (except perhaps extreme leftists) likes the corporate media or activist journalists and propagandists.

One would think that media moguls and journos would have realized this by now. I mean, if they accepted this reality, they would not be struggling so much with the notion that no one is listening to them when it comes to pandemic mandates and the covid vaccines. Yet, journalists complain about it incessantly lately.

In fact, half the media reports I see these days are not fact based analysis of events, but corporate journalists interviewing OTHER corporate journalists and bitching to each other about how Americans are “too ignorant” or “too conspiratorial” to grasp that journos are the anointed high priests of information.

I actually find this situation fascinating as an observer of oligarchy and being well versed in the mechanics of propaganda. The fundamental narrative of control-culture is that there are “experts” that the establishment chooses, and then there is everyone else. The “experts” are supposed to pontificate and dictate while everyone else is supposed to shut up, listen and obey.

Media elitists see themselves in the role of “the experts” and the public as devout acolytes; a faithful flock of sheep. But what happens when everyone starts ignoring the sheep herders?

The Parable explaining this reality

^165:2.4 "The true shepherd gathers his flock into the fold for the night in times of danger. And when the morning has come, he enters into the fold by the door, and when he calls, the sheep know his voice. Every shepherd who gains entrance to the sheepfold by any other means than by the door is a thief and a robber. The true shepherd enters the fold after the porter has opened the door for him, and his sheep, knowing his voice, come out at his word; and when they that are his are thus brought forth, the true shepherd goes before them; he leads the way and the sheep follow him. His sheep follow him because they know his voice; they will not follow a stranger. They will flee from the stranger because they know not his voice. This multitude which is gathered about us here are like sheep without a shepherd, but when we speak to them, they know the shepherd's voice, and they follow after us; at least, those who hunger for truth and thirst for righteousness do. Some of you are not of my fold; you know not my voice, and you do not follow me. And because you are false shepherds, the sheep know not your voice and will not follow you."

The other day I came across this revealing interview on CBS news about a poll of Americans showing at least 30% will refuse to take the covid vaccine outright. The interview is, for some reason, with another journalist from The Atlantic with no apparent medical credentials and no insight into the data surrounding covid.

Web SOURCE Colleen Huber, NMD, February 21, 2021, updated March 23, 2021

Colleen Huber, NMD, February 21, 2021, updated March 23, 2021

Most of the links below are from medical journals, the FDA, CDC, and other entities that generally support vaccination, yet the information in this article shows how EXTREMELY RISKY the COVID-19 vaccines are.

In my family, we have a rule:  If you consider having an experimental medical procedure done,

1. Don’t even think of insisting that anyone else have it done, inside or outside the family, because they control their own bodies and health decisions, not you; and
2. Be sure you have read about and can explain in your own words all of the known risks of that procedure before embarking on it.  Also, consider potential future risks.

I ask that you, the reader, at least take time to consider the above, and at least consider reading information in the links below, before submitting to this experimental medical procedure.

Is the COVID vaccine experimental?  Pfizer and Moderna make the COVID-19 vaccines in the US. The FDA granted “emergency use authorization” for these vaccines (herein “COVID injections,” because they are unlike conventional vaccines).   Emergency use authorization is required by law to be made only if there are no effective treatments for COVID-19.  

• But are there effective COVID-19 treatments?  100s of studies done around the world have established, and repeatedly confirmed, fast, effective, well-tolerated treatments for COVID-19 that are in widespread use.  I briefly summarize them here. 

• General risk vs benefit   An emergency experimental vaccine cannot be assumed to be safer than a virus with a very high survival rate, such as COVID-19.  The average survival rate for     NO COVID treatment at all is 99.74%, and we have very successful treatments available, which should easily achieve universal survivability from COVID, if widely available.  Where does 99.74% survival come from?  Dr. John Ioannidis is the most widely cited scientist in the world.  His estimate in June 2020 of a 0.26% infection fatality rate is now confirmed around the world.    100% - 0.26% = 99.74% average survival rate.

Does the COVID injection work?  The COVID injection is not even known to stop the spread of COVID.  Dr. Larry Corey, who oversees National Institutes of Health COVID-19 vaccine trials said on 11/20/20: “The studies aren’t designed to assess transmission.  They don’t ask that question, and there’s really no information on this at this point in time.”  https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/941388.

The FDA confirms that the 1st vaccine dose correlates with increased COVID-19 infections.  "Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs 287 in the placebo group."  This data comes from Pfizer itself.  See p 42 of https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download

​What happened to the animals in the studies?  This technology has been tried on animals, and in the animal studies done, all the animals died, not immediately from the injection, but months later, from other immune disorders, sepsis and/or cardiac failure.  There has never been a long-term successful animal study using this technology.  No experimental coronavirus vaccine has succeeded in animal studies.  In this study, coronavirus vaccine caused liver inflammation in test animals.

Specific risks of COVID injections, in roughly chronological order of side-effect manifestation:

• Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is one of the ingredients.  This has been correlated with anaphylactic shock.   So the CDC is now recommending intubation kits at vaccination sites. 

• Cationic lipid coating of mRNA is known for many years to be toxic, because these (+) charged fats interact with the (–) charges on our amino acids, our cell membranes and the phosphates of our DNA.  Cationic lipids are attracted to and are destructive toward: 
• Lungs ,
• Mitochondria, red blood cells, white blood cells,
• Liver,
• Immune and nervous systems function (This is the likely cause of the Bell’s Palsy and tremors that are seen in vaccine victims.)

• mRNA:  Unlike a traditional vaccine, of injected, inactivated virus intended to stimulate antibody response, the COVID injection on the other hand is completely different in this respect.  It uses messenger RNA (mRNA), which is a blueprint for your cells to create COVID-like (spike) proteins.  Then your cells begin to make these COVID-like proteins.  However, those proteins, in turn, stimulate your body to make antibodies against them.  So now your body has been turned into a munitions factory for both sides of a war:  The bad guys (COVID-like spike proteins) and the good guys (the antibodies fighting against them).  However, before you pledge allegiance to the good guys, as you will see below, the good guys can be more lethal to the vaccinated person.

• History of mRNA injections: This technology had disastrous results in dengue fever vaccines in the past.  Dengue vaccine is a mRNA vaccine.  When this was used in children in the Philippines, many vaccinated children had far worse outcomes than unvaccinated children when they were later exposed to dengue, and many died.  Prosecution for homicide resulted.  However, this had previously been known to happen with ferrets and with cats. In all cases, the vaccinated animal or human became more vulnerable to worse disease when confronted with it. It is expected that the relatively mild COVID-19 illness, with a survival rate of 99.74%, may reduce to a much lower survival rate and become a truly lethal disease in vaccinated people when they later become infected with it.  There are no peer-reviewed published human trials of mRNA vaccines at all, and no mRNA vaccine has ever been FDA approved. That’s how new the technology is.

• mRNA can affect DNA.  One of the most worrisome risks with a mRNA vaccine is what can happen with reverse transcriptase.  This is an enzyme in every cell, and it can theoretically lead to the mRNA creating changes in the cells’ DNA, a process known as viral retro-integration.   Although this possibility had been thought unlikely, MIT and Harvard scientists found it happened here.  If some of the 30 trillion or so cells in your body become permanent COVID factories, what is the long-term impact on your health, and would you want that outcome?

• Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) problem:   Prior attempts to create a coronavirus vaccine killed all the test animals, after they were later infected with wild virus.  Here’s what happened:  mRNA instructed the mammals’ cells to produce the spike proteins of the coronavirus.  Then, later, when the animals confronted the wild virus, the intense build-up of antibodies had been stockpiled, and their sudden and overwhelming release killed the test animal.  These risks have been documented in Nature, Science and Journal of Infectious Diseases.  Here’s a study from Nature on that.

• ADE mechanism:  ADE is a form of pathogenic priming, meaning the vaccine can result in a more severe disease, which has been seen in prior attempts at making coronavirus vaccines.  The antibodies made can be neutralizing (which inactivate a virus, and that’s good), but antibodies are a problem when they are non-neutralizing, because then these antibodies carry active viruses directly to macrophages, which then become infected.  This is how ADE happens.

This antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) leads to:

• increased viral replication (more viruses to make you sick); and
• more severe disease

• ADE result: These macrophages tend to go to the lungs and fill the lungs, causing overwhelming inflammation and airway obstruction (as found later on autopsy).    However, the augmented antibodies also attack similar-looking proteins on internal organs, resulting in cytokine storm and death or auto-immune disease and organ failure.  “Cats that showed high titers following vaccination succumbed at later timepoints to fatal disease.” ​

• What about miscarriages, and why have men been advised to freeze their sperm prior to getting the injection?  Both men and women are at risk for possibly permanent infertility, because the spike protein of a coronavirus “looks” to the immune system similar to Syncytin-1, an essential protein in the placenta.  This stimulates antibodies to fight the placenta, and possibly sperm.  Mid-term miscarriages, which are normally very rare, have occurred in women who have been vaccinated for COVID.  SARS-CoV-2 viral particles have been found to linger in the testicles of men after recovery from infection.

• Why are COVID vaccinees MORE likely to spread COVID than the unvaccinated?  Virologist Geert Vanden Bossche PhD, who worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, recently warned the World Health Organization (WHO) that "We are currently turning vaccinees into carriers shedding infectious variants."​

• Why is it more dangerous to vaccinate against COVID-19 than other viruses?  Because COVID-19 virus uses the ACE-2 receptor to get into your endothelial cells, including those lining the blood vessels.  This creates an inflammatory reaction that the great majority (99.74%) have survived even without treatment, and even more who used known, effective treatments. (See page 1)   So if you have been exposed to the virus, and then get vaccinated, it is almost certain that the vaccine will cause new inflammation and damage to endothelial cells lining your blood vessels, and we have seen short-term abnormal blood clotting in people who have gotten the vaccine.  But the more likely problem is launching new disease in the blood vessels.  Dr. H Noorchashm MD, PhD says, “. . . the vaccine is almost certain to do damage to the vascular endothelium.” He explains here. 

Israel is at this writing the most heavily COVID-vaccinated country in the world.  The findings of infectious disease experts are reported here, in which they determined, from the Israeli data, that the COVID injection causes:

• " . . .mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly . . .”

How to protect yourself and your family

• Always read the Product Package Insert.  This is required by law to be included with packaging of all vaccines, and US Informed Consent law protects your right to be fully informed prior to any medical procedure, and your right to reject any medical procedure.  45 CFR § 46.116.   These are universal principles enshrined in the Nuremberg Code and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  Here is the Pfizer insert, and here is Moderna’s.  I strongly recommend reading ALL of it carefully with your family before you make a decision regarding whether to have the COVID injection.

• Discuss the considerations above, as well as other information you have heard about the COVID injection in a relaxed, unhurried setting with your loved ones.  Make sure that you are not pressured into a procedure that you may regret in the future.  If you choose to defer or reject the COVID injection, know that you are not alone, and many healthcare workers have done the same.  "I've heard Tuskegee more times than I can count in the last month - and, you know, it's a valid, valid concern." Dr. Nikhila Juvvadi, a hospital chief clinical officer.

• Share this page with others who are also considering the vaccine. 

• If your employer or school attempts mandatory vaccination, show this information to them.  Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination, such as the COVID injection, that is under EUA (explained above). You should also consult your attorney to look into state and federal law prohibiting forced medical procedures.  NVIC.org and ICanDecide.org may also have helpful information.

• If you have read and understood this article, and the warnings in all the scientific studies linked, you can now see that  taking the COVID injection is an act of extreme and reckless self-destruction.  As a physician, I strongly advise against this vaccine, regardless of brand, for everyone, without exception.

• If on the other hand, you find that the scientific information in this paper is overwhelming, there is another way to look at COVID virus vs COVID vaccine risks.  How many famous people died within 2 weeks after taking the COVID vaccine?
• 

COVID-19 VACCINE Considerations

Statement of interests 

The author has served as an expert witness in court cases involving questions of safety regarding vaccines.

​© Colleen Huber, NMD

​Dr. Huber’s research interests since early 2020 have focused on questions of safety regarding masks.  Most of these peer-reviewed articles are in Primary Doctor Medical Journal.

This is a heartbreaking story from an Australian mom, Rajni Sharma, who pieced together and traced the timeline of her young daughter’s death to her 18 month old measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination. Ranji shares her painful experience and her only child’s tragic story. She hopes the life of her baby girl will help someone out there make an informed decision.

Rajni: My beautiful daughter lived every day of her little life to the fullest before she got her 18 month old MMR vaccine. Alina “Ali” was born on May 12, 2016, full term, healthy, and a happy little bundle of love and life. Ali was my dream come true. With her I learned the love of a child, love that has no boundary or condition — pure selfless love. She was very loving, caring, and a funny little girl. Ali had an amazing sense of humor and would love to play this game of pretending to want to give you a cuddle. As soon as you go to give her a cuddle, Ali would turn away and burst out in a giggle.

Ali also went to daycare when she was only five months old and never cried while at daycare. She just loved meeting people. She had a great sense of security, knew she was loved, and enjoyed just being surrounded by loved ones. Ali also knew when it was time for her to come back home from daycare. As soon as she used to see Patrick, her dad, at the doorstep of the daycare, she would jump into his arms and not look back. She knew it was time to have playtime with daddy. She also knew when it was time for sleeping, eating, bathing, dressing up, photos, massage, and it was all about mummy. Ali loved playing drums in her bath and enjoyed getting me all wet by splashing water all over me. It was lot of fun for both of us.

Ali having her “babychino.” She loved the idea of copying me having my coffee.

Life was good! I was living my dream and this was the last time Ali was truly happy. Then the time came for her 18 month old MMR vaccine.

After that day when Ali received her MMR vaccine, she started sleeping a lot, stopped playing, lost all interest in food. I noticed the change straight away and so did the daycare. They sent me the message checking if Ali had been okay because she had been sleeping a lot and looked extremely tired. Being a first time mom, I said she could be teething. So naive! I never thought she was having a reaction from the vaccine. A week after the vaccine, we went to a friend’s baby shower party and Ali was not herself. Everyone asked if Ali was okay. She refused to eat anything and didn’t play with anyone. She stayed with me throughout the party. When we got back home, I changed her clothes, and made her a bottle. She refused the bottle, and the next minute I saw her face stiffen to the left and her jaw was clamping. We didn’t know what was happening to her, but we called the ambulance, and she was rushed to the hospital.

Paramedics had never seen this kind of seizure before and they just didn’t know what to do. It took us 55 minutes to get to the hospital and Ali continued to seize throughout the entire journey to the hospital. When we reached the hospital, she was given Midozalam intravenously and then she finally stopped seizing after an hour. I was shaken and broken, but still unaware if that was any adverse reaction to the vaccine because I was often told that “vaccines don’t kill babies.”

Two days later, Ali again seized, same repetition of events, but this time we were moved to Randwick Children’s Hospital for an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging). Her MRI was all clear, no tumor, no scar, no lump. I was told by the Neurologist, “Don’t worry about your daughter. She will be fine – her MRI looks good. She is the most well of all the babies on the ward and she will not die.” They diagnosed Ali with epilepsy because she already had more than two seizures. The neurologists were unable to determine the cause for her seizures since she had no fever, or any other sickness. Ali was just a healthy girl.

They asked if Ali’s vaccines were up-to-date, and I replied, “Yes, she had her 18 month MMR last week…” I stopped for awhile and asked the doctor again, “Do you think the vaccine caused my baby’s seizures?” And they said, “Oh no, that’s not possible.” I still believed the doctor because why would a doctor lie? He is not my baby’s enemy.

We went back home and were given Keppra to treat Ali’s epilepsy. Within a week, Ali had her third seizure, and that was the last day of Ali at home. Ali never returned home after that day. It was Nov 25, 2017. After that, Ali was induced in a coma after 14 hours of non-stop seizing. She woke up after five days, patted my back, and I knew Ali was back and remembered me. We stayed in the Neuro Ward as the cause was still not determined for her refractory epilepsy. (The Neuro Ward is for patients with neurological disorders, but more for care and constant observation.) Ali was tested genetically twice for mitochondrial disorders, an epilepsy panel, and any other test they could possibly run to find the cause for her prognosis. All the tests came back negative. By this time, I was certain that Ali was vaccine-injured.

With every seizure, we lost part of Ali. She lost her memory. She lost all her words, her games, and she also lost fine motor skills in her left hand. Ali’s memory loss was to the extent she forgot me and Patrick. I screamed and shouted, “Why is no one listening to me about vaccines?” And I was made to shut up because “vaccines don’t kill babies.” It could be anything else, but vaccines.

On January 12, 2018,  Ali called me “Maa” again and by that time she started to remember a few words again. She waved at someone at the hospital and said “hello” after three months. I was so happy that she was getting better and we will soon be going home. Still scared, but was hopeful. By noon, Ali started to seize again and that was the end of her little life. She seized through the rest of the January, February, and until March 26th 2018, the day she died. Ali died in my arms in a fairy garden at the hospital. I held a very cold stiff body of my baby — instead of a warm, soft, wriggly baby.

But no one dared to call it or admit that the MMR Vaccine killed my baby. Instead, I was given a two-page letter a week before her death, “That after intensive research and exome testing, we have come to the conclusion that your baby has a very rare mitochondrial disorder CARS2.” We were told that my husband and I are recessive carriers of that very rare genetic mutation and we passed on our recessive genes to our daughter.

What are the chances of my husband and I have same recessive gene? Me and my husband are not related and not even of the same ethnicity or same country. I am Indian by birth and he is English. People who mostly marry distant cousins have a good chance of passing the same recessive gene because of obvious reasons. These same genes run in families. I am quite suspicious of their final diagnosis as it indicates most likely the gene is the cause, but they are not even 100% sure. They have pulled the genetic card, planted a seed, and also have not taken the full responsibility of the diagnosis.

They suggested that CARS2 gene is most likely the cause of her condition. What’s very important to note is that kids with mitochondrial disorders show elevated levels of lactate, but Ali had not shown any signs of elevated lactate. So I don’t believe that Ali even had a mitochondrial disorder.

Turns out no one in my family or my husband’s family have any rare genetic condition except for cystic fibrosis on my husband’s side. However, Ali was not affected or a carrier of cystic fibrosis. I struggle to understand that the hospital calls every patient that they could not find an answer for has a rare genetic condition.

Even if I subscribe to the genetic angle, we were told that the mitochondrial dysfunction/disorder is actually rare. If the vaccine only triggered her condition, then why don’t they include mitochondrial disorders or gene mutations in the clinical trials and studies? What I learned from Ali’s admission to the hospital is that mitochondrial disorders are actually not that rare. I met a lot of parents at the hospital who have been given this “rare” mitochondrial card. If this is SO rare, why are there SO many kids with rare mitochondrial disorders?

You wouldn’t give peanuts to a newborn because they could be allergic to peanuts, it’s common sense isn’t it? But that’s not the case for vaccines. The same vaccines are prescribed to all children. Lots are dying of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), some are living life with seizures, autoimmune disorders, autism, and other health issues. I connected the dots with what I saw with my baby. I am a mother and I knew my baby. I knew my baby more than anyone else.

Q&A with Rajni:

Q: Do the doctors and has your doctor in Australia ever explained informed consent and provided you with the full risks/benefits of the vaccines? Did they give you a package insert and explain the side effects, including seizures and death?

Rajni: Not at all. They only tell you your child might have slight fever, which is a very common reaction to any vaccines.

Q: Was an autopsy performed on Ali?

CLICK IMAGE ABOVE TO KNOW WHAT TO DO IF YOUR CHILD DIES FROM A VACCINE

Healthy Infant Dies In Sleep After Vaccines Yet His Death Is Ruled “SIDS” 

<This video shows us a bright, bubbly, healthy five month old little boy named Charlie along with his mom, Jessica Waters, just days before he passed away [you must be a member of the Stop Mandatory Vaccination Facebook group to see the video]. Charlie had his newborn vaccines, received vaccinations again at two months old, and another round of injections at four months. Unexpectedly, he died within weeks of his last vaccines. Jessica is a first-time mom who is heartbroken and mourning her baby; the shock and pain she felt when she lost her infant to vaccines is immeasurable and unimaginable. Jessica’s story is one of the many heart-aching stories we have featured from parents who have deeply suffered from losing their child after vaccination.

Coincidence, again? When does a coincidence become recognized as an obvious pattern?

VIDEO CHARLIE DAYS BEFORE HIS DEATH

Jessica: I lost my son, Charlie, January 25th, 2018 and they said it was because of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). I haven’t done a lot of research, but I have seen SIDS is linked to vaccines. My son was PERFECTLY healthy. He was just fine and then boom, he was gone. He was two days shy of 5 months old when he died and had just received some of his vaccines, but not all of them because I didn’t allow that. I was doing my research, but that didn’t go far because I didn’t fully understand everything I read. He didn’t have any problems at all at the time which is why it’s such a shock.

Jessica Shares Her Story
My son Charlie was born August 27th 2017. He had to stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) for a few days because his breathing was a little off and I know he had the newborn shots, whatever that consisted of. He received the Hepatitis B vaccine for sure. His breathing eventually got better after a few days and when he would drink a bottle it was kind of fast paced, but he managed the breathing fine. His breathing was an issue at first, but after he came out of NICU, he was fine. I believe he also got shots at his 2-month old visit and Hepatitis B was one of them and DTaP. I had only allowed a few shots and not all of them because my mom went with me to the doctor’s visit. My mom used to be ok with the vaccines, but when I had Charlie she was completely against them all. My mom shared I had received my vaccinations and she had them as well, but they were different from when I was a kid. There’s a lot more vaccinations now on the Center for Disease Control’s (CDCs) recommended childhood vaccination schedule when my son had received his shots than from when we both had them many years ago.

Besides the breathing issues, things went fine. However, roughly a month or so after, my son had some more shots again before he died at five months old. I’m not too familiar with what he received being I’m new to all of this. I hated him getting shots because I hated when he would cry and be upset afterwards.

January 25th came around and the night before I had cleaned the house completely. That day on the 25th, I was exhausted from staying up until 4-5 a.m. in the morning cleaning and taking care of Charlie. And that morning he was fine, he had a bottle, and my sister played with him. When he came back to me, I played with him for a few minutes and laid him down cradled in my arm. He fell asleep and I fell asleep right after. Well, we fell asleep about 12 p.m. (lunch time) and he ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS, wakes me up every three hours. 4 o’clock p.m. came around and I woke up, and already was wary as it was an hour past his wake-up time. I said his name — he didn’t respond. I picked him up and shook him a little and nothing. It gets kind of blurry here, but I started to freak out and ran to the living room.

My little sister followed from running into my room and she realized what happened. I was frozen. Immediately my younger sister called 911 and my older sister started taking control of the situation. She talked to the lady at the police station who walked us through Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). But I had noticed after trying the mouth to mouth resuscitation, he had just a little bit of blood dripping from his nose. As soon as the ambulance and the cops arrived, they pretty much pronounced him dead that I am aware of. I didn’t really see them try to do anything to help bring him back. They had said that he was already gone and they had said he was cold, but he wasn’t cold to me. Charlie’s death was declared at 5:25 p.m. on January 25th.

Charlie’s case was referred to a medical examiner. They called his death as SIDS and his death “could not be determined.” No one even explained the autopsy report findings to his mother Jessica. She shared, “I had given him Benadryl and he had a little of that in his blood.” The autopsy also indicated mild-moderate pneumonia. Jessica continues, “as to why the pneumonia was found is a straight shock.”

Breathing and respiratory problems in newborns do occur after vaccines are administered. There is risk that is often overshadowed by the perceived “benefit” of infant vaccines. While infant respiratory issues may or may not be a common occurrence in a healthy newborn, they are a critical vaccine side effect to be watchful of. The severity of reactions needs to be monitored and cautiously navigated. Severe adverse vaccine reactions in infants include breathing problems, wheezing, hives, weakness, fainting, dizziness, and irregular heartbeats. Pro-vaccination health websites, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the CDC often strategically minimize and underestimate the dangers, adverse reactions, and symptoms post vaccination.

SIDS is often mis-categorized as “Vaccine Infant Death Syndrome” (VIDS) and extensive autopsy toxicology tests are not performed. The timing of the infant deaths considering the aggressive vaccination schedule at 2, 4, and 6 months old, is more than coincidence, random statistics, aberrant genetics, and bad luck. An article from August 2017, courtesy of Health Freedom Idaho, “Court Rules Vaccines Contribute to and Cause SIDS,” explores this connection further. Injury and deaths post vaccination are not rare “one in a million” incidents as the propaganda parrots regurgitate, push, and sell their “how very safe and effective” claims to the misinformed public. There is even a guide available for parents on what to do if your child dies after vaccines and autopsy medical test recommendations! A previous infant death story after vaccines we covered addressed SIDS in more detail and includes more resources and statistics.

Charlie’s death is another atrocious tragedy that could have been averted had his medical providers had his best interest and health in mind. Doctors and medical professionals need to do a much better job at informing their patients, parents, and families, about the dangers and full risks of vaccines, especially for infants with developing immune systems. Jessica shared, “I never got anything about vaccines. Nothing. At all. Never got anything on the risks or the side effects.” She was not given any Vaccine Information Sheet (VIS) and certainly no vaccine product package insert that included the full risks, benefits, contraindications and precautions of who should not receive the vaccines, the spectrum of dangers, including death, the ingredients, or the specific information about the clinical trials.

The lack of knowledge offered to patients about the full risks, side effects, contraindications, and dangers by the medical community is astounding. Had the NICU nurses and doctors warned Jessica that her son’s breathing condition may have been caused by or linked to his vaccines and instructed her to halt future rounds of vaccines, until it was determined what actually caused his issues, perhaps Charlie would still be alive? What if Jessica was provided the proper immunity and health information for her to make an educated and informed choice regarding vaccines? Maybe then Jessica would not be mourning and missing her precious sweet boy.

Jessica: It’s been terrible and shitty without him. I miss him so much. He was my everything. I don’t get how my son could just be taken like that. I honestly didn’t want to live after he left this terrible horrible shitty earth. I didn’t see how people can live and be ok or fine after losing such a precious life. Yeah being woken up every couple of hours is sooooo much “fun” with an infant. But if I could go back and change it, I would have stayed up 24/7 and forgotten about sleep.

Jessica’s advice to parents: I would definitely tell other parents to have some kind of baby monitor to monitor the baby while sleeping. It would help someone to have some kind of reassurance for their baby.