SpiritualFamily.Net: i Witness NEWS's blogs

Dr. Mark Trozzi - Personal Testimony about the Corona Virus Deception

i Witness NEWS — Mon, 08 Mar 2021 23:28:01 -0500

Dr. Mark Trozzi - Personal Testimony about the Corona Virus Deception

My Personal Testimony

Introduction

My name is Mark Trozzi. I am a medical doctor; I graduated in 1990 from The University of Western Ontario. I have been practicing Emergency Medicine for the past twenty-five years; and I have been on call in multiple emergency units since the onset of the so-called “pandemic”, including one ER designated specifically for COVID-19. I am an Advanced Trauma Life Support professor with the College of Surgeons of America, and I hold teaching positions at Sunnybrook Health Sciences in the Advanced Life Support Department, as well as with both Queen’s University and The University of Ottawa.

What follows is my observations and opinions; I am bound by my personal and religious convictions to speak openly and honestly. I do not have authority to tell you “the truth”, but I will share my honest experiences, perceptions, and digests of hundreds of hours of research on the subject of covid-19.

At the onset of this “pandemic”, I was cautious and hence meticulous with N95 mask use, hand washing, social isolation and distancing etc. I studied coronavirus science and was deeply involved in many emergency department drills to modify our practice in profound ways to deal with the “killer virus” we were advertised. However, various things soon made me consider that we were being deceived and manipulated. Here are a few:

The First Wave

The “first wave” of the “pandemic” was absolutely the quietest time in my career. I have worked very hard and been very busy over the past twenty-five years in ER. However, both in my regular ER and my “COVID-19 designated” ER, there were almost no patients, and almost no work. I had multiple long ER shifts without a single patient. Meanwhile, when I would go to the local grocery store, the propagandized public, God bless them, would usher me to the front of the antisocial distance line, thanking me for everything I was going through as a front-line emergency doctor. They believed that the ER’s and hospitals were full of patients dying from covid, and that I must be exhausted and at risk of dying myself from exposure. I began contacting doctors and friends all over Canada and the US, and found the same pattern: empty hospitals, and propaganda saying that they were full of patients dying of covid.

Early Investigation

Early in my studies, I investigated zinc and hydroxychloroquine, which based on sound physiology, may genuinely help those rare persons who get very sick with this cold virus. I was surprised that this treatment was simply brushed aside and dismissed by most of the medical community.

Early Concerns

Researching the World Health Organization, of the UN, I learned that the Chinese dictatorship (PRC) had propped up a ******* communist “Dr” Tedros, as the head of the WHO; and I learned how the PRC had been involved in: the virus release; the cover up for weeks; the disappearing and suppression of honest Chinese doctors and scientist; the spreading of the virus to the world (sparing Beijing where the PRC elite live); and dramatic abuse of the Chinese people in their well-timed lockdown, which was filmed and transmitted to the world to create the panic that herded all of us into surrendering our economies and civil rights.

Foxes Gaurding the Henhouse

I learned how Canada’s chief public health officer Dr Tam, is on the oversight committee of the WHO with Dr Tedros, essentially making her a ******-agent; and I listened to her often-******* dissertations to Canadians regarding covid-19.

My Perception of the Situation

I perceive that at every level, hospital administration has had no apparent choice, other than to submit to the endless top down roll out from governments, of questionable new rules, protocols, and procedures. My honest conversations with coworkers about my research and observations, became a problem. Caught in this quandary, an important administrator who I greatly respect, told me that “my thoughts made others uncomfortable, and made it difficult to keep everyone motivated and compliant” with all the new protocols and restrictions. Sympathetic to the sad situation, I maintained my clinical position by promising to “bite my tongue any time I thought I was going to speak about COVID-19” in the hospital. This was ultimately ethically impossible for me, and I have recently removed myself from the ER to avoid conflict.

Have I Ever Seen a Covid-19 Patient?

I have never seen a patient sick with COVID-19; I have seen some positive PCR tests in asymptomatic people, and watched people be imprisoned in their own homes and isolated from family and friends. My research into the PCR test has convinced me personally that it is misleading, manipulatable, and being used to drain endless taxpayer’s money and future debt, to dramatically enrich the very criminals running this scandal. My province alone has performed ~50,000 PCR tests daily. Meanwhile our federal government is bringing in hundreds of thousands of doses of potentially dangerous experimental injections of modified viral genetic material, calling them “vaccines”, and having the military manage them. Is this reasonable for a predominantly mild and non-fatal viral illness.

Information Suppression?

I have watched the suppression of doctors and scientists who performed serum antibody studies, whose findings showed that the virus was much more widespread, yet generally nonfatal, and asymptomatic or very mild in most cases; and that in many regions we had likely already achieved natural herd immunity by summer 2020.

Look at this study performed in Wuhan itself, which shows that the virus was done there by June 1, 2020 just two months after their brief lockdowns ended, and no one was spreading it, not even the very few people with a positive PCR “test” (and they were not sick): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

China

I noticed that after China’s theatric lockdown, they quickly went back to business as usual, while all our economies were frozen; they gained tremendous control over the world’s marketplace. It seems a great though evil strategy!

Political Manipulation of Health Care Workers

I perceive that many things we learned in medical school about infectious disease, have been brushed aside and replaced by constantly expanding lists of often ******* mandates by public health officials. Doctors, nurses, and teachers are especially important to the success of this COVID-19 deception, as we are leaders in society and people trust our advice. So, it is no surprise that I have found free speech and thought have been very suppressed in our ranks. Rather than endure the punishments of dissenting, we can choose to experience the short-sighted perks like extremely quiet days in the ER, replacing our traditional hands-on work with Zoom sessions from home; and accessing a variety of new COVID-19 ******* codes. At one point, an option existed to make more money than I normally make working in a busy ER, to just stay home and be available in case the covid swabbing nurse needed to video conference with me.

There are many positive and negative motivators being used to manipulate Canadian doctors, nurses and teachers, to inadvertently participate in this grand covid deception; but this is destroying our society. To use a Titanic metaphor: “even the luxury suites on the Titanic end up at the bottom of the ocean when she sinks”. Also, much of what is being done, including the experimental viral genetic injections, seem to violate the Nuremberg code regarding medical experimentation with full informed consent by the participants. Doctor’s and nurses face tough decisions. My career as an emergency physician always provided me an opportunity to practice my religious and ethical beliefs of honesty and kindness, while making a good living. Now maintaining the career I love, would require participating in the deception, violating my oath and spiritual beliefs, and in my opinion committing crimes against humanity as defined by the Nuremberg Code.

I empathize with all my fellow doctors and nurses. We are all victims of the covid abuse.

Deeper Investigation

I researched and perceived how corrupt oligarchs seem to have planned this crime against humanity. This planning included Event 201 which was a simulation of a corona pandemic conducted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins University in October 2019; and the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 Viral outbreak simulation planning called “Operation Lockstep”. Both these projects described how a viral outbreak would be used to bring in an authoritarian system with the loss of our human rights and freedoms. I also observed how their cohorts in big tech like Google, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube worked to censor and deceive us all; it’s genuine propaganda.

Regarding the Use of Face Masks:

The forced wearing of masks by most of the world’s population is not unanimously supported by real science. These masks cause significant harm to our psychologic, social, dermatologic, dental and otolaryngotic health. Though I generally have great health, the masks have given me rashes and nasal symptoms whenever I have had to wear them for prolonged periods, which resolve whenever I do not wear them for a few days. What I find most disturbing is the elimination of facial expressions, and hence normal visual social interaction.

Regarding Covid-19 Vaccinations:

The history of past attempts at vaccines for coronaviruses, revealed some very dangerous side effects in animal models, and the efforts were abandoned. Why would we take a dangerous vaccine for a generally mild illness, to which we develop herd immunity anyways? The current roll-out of fast tracked expensive experimental “vaccines” is burying the taxpayers in endless debt to the rich and powerful villains of this story. Yet, we the people who have been imprisoned and abused in this scandal, are being manipulated into taking new strange injections, in hopes that we might regain some of our freedom. Additionally the so called “vaccines” are not vaccines (unless we change the definition of vaccines). Rather they are injections of Corona virus genes. See the section This Is Not A Vaccine

Difficult Decisions

Recently, I have made some tough personal decisions; surrendering income and personal security, to choose an ethical and honest path forward, that may help contribute to an outcome that is true and just; and to the return of our free society and civil liberties. I believe that we are almost all victims in this, regardless of where we are on the path for the recovery of truth.

If you would like to support my work, please consider donating. Blessings.

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE MEDICIAL PROFESSIONALS SPEAKING OUT ARE RISKING THEIR LIVELIHOOD TO DO SO. BY SUPPORTING THEM WE WILL LIBERATE THE FACTS AND THE TRUTH.

The Unholy Sacrament of the Damned Vaccine

i Witness NEWS — Mon, 08 Mar 2021 21:31:22 -0500

The Unholy Sacrament of the Damned Vaccine

By Yvonne Lorenzo

March 8, 2021

As someone who follows the Way of Jesus Christ, and therefore is libertarian in that I entirely agree that human freedom and liberty is reflected in the ability to make choices, I in no ways present myself as someone who has the right to compel anyone to do anything or not to do anything; I am specifically discussing the “vaccines,” currently manufactured by Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson and Johnson that have been administered to tens of millions of Americans, in addition to many throughout the world. Articles posted on LewRockwell.com by Bill Sardi (whose site also contains accessible copies of his recent writing posted to LewRockwell.com, but one cannot copy any text and share, only email entire links) and from Robert F. Kennedy’s Children’s Health Defense website, (which recently posted this article on adverse events) along with many others discuss not only potential but likely dangers to those who take the vaccine (see here).

What I find extremely disturbing from both a medical and ethical perspective is Children’s Health Defense revelations is in the article on Johnson and Johnson’s vaccine, it noted in a “letter submitted to the FDA a year ago by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which expressed concern about the development of COVID-19 vaccines reliant on ‘ethically problematic’ cell lines,” for using the tissue of a healthy 18 month old aborted fetus, modified “To produce a continuous cell line of this type—what is called an ‘immortalized’ cell line—scientists must artificially manipulate the original cells, which otherwise would have finite lifespans. This is accomplished by introducing chemical exposures or rendering them cancerous. Because this manipulation introduces genetic changes into the cells, ‘cell populations and cellular mechanisms are altered.’”

Yet if one looks to the legacy media—sources of information that are viewed by millions—one finds stories such as these (perusing the titles and watching a few seconds will give the general idea):

Dozens of senior citizens set up camp overnight outside the Fort Myers Stars Complex in Florida to mark their number in line to get the COVID-19 vaccine.

I think just the titles and viewing a few seconds of the above videos, which I fear are representative of the manipulations by the misanthropic oligarchs and the attitudes of the vast majority of the population are worrying indeed. To me, many Americans view receiving the vaccine as something more special than winning the lottery—or any possible “dream come true,” which I find terribly sad.

In addition, I find ironic is that for those who trust in God (and again, this is one’s personal choice; I intend not to compel anyone in such a private, highly personal choice) now is the time of Lent. On the Catholic website Lifesite News, this story appeared recently: “Lenten penances this year expand beyond atoning for our own sins to those of the world.” On the Catholic site The Remnant, this article, “Indoctrinated to be Inoculated” is worthy of consideration, in which the author, Greg Maresca wisely writes:

The resolve that vaccination is somehow a social responsibility is not a self-evident truth. No matter how noble, it is limited. As immunity builds, the risk of infection drops. Herd immunity certainly fits as we stampede into hysteria too easily. The ends do not justify immoral or unethical means.

A dishonest press and rampant censorship by social media regarding the inexpensive, safe and effective therapies like ivermectin, colchicine, fluvoxamine and hydroxychloroquine could have prevented many from dying.

The cure should never be more invasive than the disease.

When a vaccine to protect us from Leftism is developed, I will consider.

Similarly, for the Orthodox faithful, Orthodox Reflections posted this article, “Saving the World from the Fear of Death,” the author observes:

After more than a week in a rehab facility, the last thing we expected was to see Dad looking worse. The doctor thought that a few weeks in the facility would help our 83-year-old Dad improve after surgery. He’d been in this rehab facility before, but that was pre-COVID and things had been different. For the past week, Dad had been in complete isolation for safety, of course. No visitors, no leaving the room. Just hours of sleeping or watching television. We had come into town to “visit” him by standing outside his closed window and talking to him on his cell phone. He looked worse than we had ever seen him. It was all we could do to keep from crying.

Despite testing negative for COVID multiple times in the hospital, Dad had been sentenced to solitary confinement as you can never be too careful. If it saves one life, after all… During his isolation, Dad had developed a tremor so bad that he could barely hold his phone. He slumped in his wheelchair, disoriented and sullen. He had trouble remembering simple details. His eyes were dull and sunken. While we were outside talking to him, a worker came into his room with lunch. It was in a Styrofoam takeout container instead of on a plate because COVID. She was totally hidden in PPE, saying nothing to Dad as she dropped the food and hastily retreated because COVID. With trembling hands, Dad managed to lift the lid and show us the pile of slop underneath. He couldn’t remember the last time he ate. He said he wasn’t hungry and the food was garbage anyway…

They are withering away and dying in solitude. To “protect” the elderly, governments have taken away everything that makes life worth living to begin with. Nor is it even just the elderly who are suffering from enforced isolation. Public “health” authorities in one area of Canada issued guidelines to parents instructing them to keep children whose classmate tested positive for COVID-19 isolated in a separate room from all other family members for 14 days. Healthy, young parents are locking up their own kids in isolation for two weeks because some government bureaucrat told them to. It is hard to tell what is more insane–the fact that some parents are actually doing this or the fact that they tell others about it on social media.

Again, I reiterate that each individual must decide whether or not to receive the COVID vaccines; but I regret the major impetus driving any decision is not only peer pressure and legacy media propaganda, but fear—the fear of death. And several relatives and friends have chosen to get vaccinated—neighbors too—and all I can do, if they listen, should they suffer an adverse nonfatal event is to let them know about Resveratrol, Zinc, and the vitamins A and D, as Bill Sardi has written on this site, to mitigate the toxicity.

My own position is not to be so frightened of death, which is inevitable, but to love God, the Holy Trinity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, and the ever blessed Virgin Mary as our intercessor, and to work as diligently as possible to transform myself for the better, to become closer to God in this holy time of the year with the promise of Life Eternal. For those who are Christians, may God grant you strength and wisdom to make the right decision; it cannot hurt to pray to Him for His guidance, and His love, comes what may.

The Best of Yvonne Lorenzo

Yvonne Lorenzo [send her email] makes her home in New England in a house full to bursting with books, including works on classical Greece and Russian history and literature, and has contributed to LewRockwell.com, Unz.com and to TheSaker.is. Her interests include gardening, mythology, ancient history, The Electric Universe, and classical music, especially the compositions of Handel, Mozart, Bach, Haydn, Beethoven, Tchaikovsky, Mahler, Wagner and the Bel Canto repertoire. She is the author of he Spear of Odin Trilogy: , and the just published .

SOURCE

Death Rates Skyrocket in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental COVID “Vaccines”

i Witness NEWS — Mon, 08 Mar 2021 21:08:45 -0500

Death Rates Skyrocket in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental COVID “Vaccines”

By Brian Shilhavy
Health Impact News

March 3, 2021

“This is a new Holocaust” – Haim Yativ and Dr. Seligmann

We have previously reported how Israel rapidly vaccinated the highest percentage of their population with experimental COVID vaccines after the Israeli government struck a bargain with Pfizer to secure millions of doses of their mRNA COVID vaccines.

Vera Sharav wrote:

It is astonishing that the government of Israel entrusted the health of the people to Pfizer; by entering into a secret contract that enrolled the Israeli population to become research subjects, without their knowledge or consent.

See:

Are More People Being Harmed by the Pfizer Experimental “Vaccine” than from COVID? Israeli Population Now the World’s Lab Rats Sold Out to Pfizer

To date, Israel has vaccinated over 53% of their population, twice the percentage of the next closest nation, Britain, with 26.9%.

Source.

The “official news” published by the corporate media claiming that the vaccines have been effective in reducing rates of COVID in Israel has been scrutinized and examined by Aix-Marseille University Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit’s Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ, who published their results on a discussion forum website called “Nakim.”

The information quickly went viral, and has now been translated into several languages and addressed on various news sites around the world, including Arutz Sheva 7, IsraelNationalNews.com.

Mordechai Sones writes:

A front-page article appeared in the FranceSoir newspaper about findings on the Nakim website regarding what some experts are calling “the high mortality caused by the vaccine.”
The paper interviews Aix-Marseille University Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit’s Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ about their research and data analysis.
They claim that Pfizer’s shot causes “mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly, when the documented mortality from coronavirus is in the vicinity of the vaccine dose, thus adding greater mortality from heart attack, stroke, etc.”
Dr Hervé Seligmann works at the Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. He is of Israeli-Luxembourg nationality. He has a B. Sc. In Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and has written over 100 scientific publications.
FranceSoir writes that they follow publications, data analyzes, and feedback from various countries on vaccination, and have therefore taken an interest in the Nakim article, asking to interview them in order to understand their analysis and its limitations.
The authors of the article declare they have no conflicts or interests other than having children in Israel.
After a presentation, the authors discussed their data analysis, the validations carried out, limitations, and above all, their conclusions that they compare with data received via a Health Ministry Freedom of Information Act request.
Their findings are:

There is a mismatch between the data published by the authorities and the reality on the ground.

They have three sources of information, besides the emails and adverse event reports they receive through the Internet. These three sources are Israeli news site Ynet, the Israeli Health Ministry database, and the U.S. federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database.

In January 2021, there were 3,000 records of vaccine adverse events, including 2,900 for mRNA vaccines.

Compared to other years, mortality is 40 times higher.

On February 11, a Ynet article presented data related to vaccination. The authors of the Nakim article claim to have debunked this analysis based on data published by Ynet itself: “We took the data by looking at mortality during the vaccination period, which spans 5 weeks. By analyzing these data, we arrived at startling figures that attribute significant mortality to the vaccine.”

The authors say “vaccinations have caused more deaths than the coronavirus would have caused during the same period.”

Haim Yativ and Dr. Seligmann declare that for them, “this is a new Holocaust,” in face of Israeli authority pressure to vaccinate citizens.

They also invite specialists to complete their analyses, and intend to pursue legal follow-up to their discovery. The Health Ministry was not available for comment on a FranceSoir query regarding the findings.
The authors also deplored “the fact of not being able to communicate on this vital information” to their fellow citizens.
Full article here.

Mordechai Sones also has his own radio broadcast in Israel, and a few weeks ago he began his broadcast by reading the names of 28 people who have died following the Pfizer experimental COVID mRNA injections.

The list begins with some elderly Rabbis, but also includes young people who reportedly had no existing health problems and died suddenly, including a 25-year-old woman.

After reading these 28 names, Mordechai states:

The list continues, but cannot be brought here in its entirety due to time constraints.

An Israeli man who posted this reading on YouTube stated:

[embed title="Death Rates Skyrocket in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental COVID “Vaccines”" url="https://spiritualfamily.net/blog/view/36198/death-rates-skyrocket-in-israel-following-pfizer-experimental-covid-%E2%80%9Cvaccines%E2%80%9D" summary="Death Rates Skyrocket in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental COVID “Vaccines” By Brian Shilhavy Health Impact News March 3, 2021 “This is a new Holocaust” – Haim Yativ and Dr. Seligmann We have previously reported how Israel rapidly..." guid="36198"]

I made this short video with an audio broadcast of Mordechai Sones; so that I could pass on the information that many people here in Israel have been dying after receiving the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine.
But none of this information seems to be making it into the mainline media.
I am calling on everyone to pray and seek the Lord to have this evil thing stopped immediately.

Here is the video from our Rumble Channel, and it is also on our Bitchute Channel.

I think it is safe to conclude that what is happening in Israel right now with the massive roll out of the experimental Pfizer COVID mRNA vaccine is a test of what the Globalists desire to roll out in other countries around the world, so everyone should be watching carefully what Israel is doing right now to see what is probably coming to the U.S. and other countries around the world.

From Mordechai Sones’ Facebook Page.Buy New $22.25 ($0.09 / Count)(as of 02:45 EST - Details)

Israel has now started a “Green Pass” program that requires people to show proof of COVID vaccination to gain entrance to “registered” places of business. This was published yesterday, 2/28/21 in The Jerusalem Post:

The country is expected to further return to routine on Sunday and to facilitate this, the Health Ministry will roll out its “green passport” program.
A green passport will be required to enter certain places and to participate in certain activities. Only people who have been vaccinated or have recovered from coronavirus will be eligible for one.
As part of the program, registered gyms, theaters, hotels, concerts and synagogues will be able to operate starting next week.
“We are giving a huge line to vaccinators,” Health Minister Yuli Edelstein said on Thursday during an extensive briefing.
“This is the first step back to an almost normal life.”

Welcome to the new “almost normal.” Will the Israelis and other populations around the world comply with this?

Comment on this article at HealthImpactNews.com.

.SOURCE

Are More People Being Harmed by the Pfizer Experimental “Vaccine” than from COVID? Israeli Population Now the World’s Lab Rats Sold Out to Pfizer

i Witness NEWS — Sat, 06 Mar 2021 00:16:27 -0500

Are More People Being Harmed by the Pfizer Experimental “Vaccine” than from COVID? Israeli Population Now the World’s Lab Rats Sold Out to Pfizer

Government Consigned Israeli Population to be Human Subjects in a Massive Experiment

by Vera Sharav
Alliance for Human Research Protection

BBC: “Israel bought large stocks of the [Covid-19] jab in exchange for acting as the world’s guinea pig.”

On November 18, 2020, Israel’s senior health officials were caught unprepared when Pfizer announced that its vaccine was “90% effective” (revised to 95%) against Covid-19.

They had ordered millions of vaccine doses from Moderna and AstraZeneca but none for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

How then, did Israel procure an estimated four to five million doses of the Pfizer vaccine in December 2020 – enough to vaccinate at least two million people?

Benjamin Netanyahu- Donald Trump

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu sought to show that he singlehandedly saved the day; as did Donald Trump when he launched Operation Warp Speed, to accelerate the production and distribution of Covid-19 vaccines.

Both heads of state entered into secret contracts with vaccine manufacturers. Both failed to disclose to their constituents that the COVID-19 (mRNA) vaccines are experimental.

The COVID-19 vaccine phase 3 clinical trials have not yet been completed. This is why both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines have NOT been licensed by the FDA. Both vaccines received “Emergency Use Authorization” (EUA): “a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures…Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products.”^[i]
The safety of these experimental vaccines has not been established during the frenzied pace of production and distribution. The sheer speed at which the vaccines were developed and tested precluded obtaining sufficient information about adverse side effects; in particular, serious, long term adverse effects.
Furthermore, mRNA technology used in these vaccines is also experimental.^[ii] No other vaccines using this technology have been approved. The long-term risks are unknown.
As of January 27, 2021, Johns Hopkins’ tracking system states that the infection fatality rate in the U.S. is 1.7%; in Israel it is 0.7%.^[iii]

According to the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), as of Dec. 18, 2020 (just when mass vaccinations began), the adverse event rate following Covid-19 vaccination was 2.79%.^[iv]

This would indicate that the short-term risk of harm from the vaccine is far greater than the risk of dying from COVID-19.

On December 10^th, at FDA’s advisory committee meeting to evaluate Pfizer’s vaccine for use under EUA, Dr. Kathrin Jansen, Pfizer’s lead representative, acknowledged that despite being vaccinated with Pfizer’s vaccine, monkeys became infected when they were exposed to the virus.^[v] Pfizer did not test whether vaccinated people could also become infected when exposed to the virus. It is, therefore, entirely possible that the Covid-19 vaccine is no defense against infection.
On January 26 2021, the World Health Organization posted the latest news about the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine: What You Need to Know, in which the WHO confirmed lack of efficacy evidence: “We do not know whether the vaccine will prevent infection and protect against onward transmission. Immunity persists for several months, but the full duration is not yet known. These important questions are being studied.”^[vi]
The acknowledged lack of evidence for the protective value of both of the mRNA vaccines refutes the widely publicized “90% -95% effectiveness” claims. The absence of evidence for the protective value of these vaccines eliminates the justification for exposure to the risks; and undermines the claimed need for these vaccines.

The high degree of panic generated by continuous, fear-generating claims about the virus, led public health officials to discard the precautionary principle in medicine – “First, do no harm”.

Despite serious uncertainty, officials proceeded full speed ahead, with mass vaccination.

Israel’s fast-track vaccination programme is providing data for the world on efficacy. Abir Sultan/EPA – Source.

It is astonishing that the government of Israel entrusted the health of the people to Pfizer; by entering into a secret contract that enrolled the Israeli population to become research subjects, without their knowledge or consent.

Under the contract, Real World Epidemiological EvidenceCollaboration Agreement,^[vii] the government signed a commitment to vaccinate the entire seven million adult population and to provide weekly data on its citizens during a 24-month surveillance follow-up study.

The government disregarded potentially serious medical risks from the experimental vaccine and risks to privacy.

Israel is considered an ideal place for a vast epidemiological study, encompassing 9.3 million people, because of its universal, state-sponsored healthcare system in which insurers maintain 40 years of digitized medical records, including vaccination records for each Israeli citizen.

This centralized system helped Israel administer more than 2 million doses of the vaccine in under a month. In exchange, Israel received priority delivery of millions of doses of the vaccines.

Netanyahu stated that the reason Israel received so many vaccine doses so quickly is that:

“Israel has committed to send Pfizer data and details especially gathered for them, including the consequences of the inoculations, side effects, efficacy, amount of time it takes to develop antibodies according to different types of population, age, gender, preexisting conditions etc. The agreement extensively details the various parameters that will be sent to Pfizer.”^[viii]

Former Prime Minister Ehud Barak pointed out that Pfizer is using the Israeli population as a “perfect testing ground” for its COVID-19 vaccine.

“This data is a treasure trove for Pfizer. It’s a huge asset to Pfizer, because it lets them show that when someone dies after being vaccinated – and people my age tend to die more often – he didn’t die because of the vaccine, but as a result of some background illness.”^[ix]

Israeli citizens became the unwitting human subjects of a massive, unethical, unapproved, non-consensual human experiment. The public was not informed that (a) the vaccine is experimental; (b) the population was being used as human subjects for a two-year epidemiological study; the data is meant to be shared with foreign countries and journals; the secrecy of the contract has led to strong suspicions that (c) their personal medical record – “a data treasure-trove” – would be shared with Pfizer

Ilana Rachel Daniel

“In effect, Bibi [Netanyahu] has signed up his people, all seven million citizens aged 12 years and over, without our informed consent, to become the first country in its entirety to do human testing on a technology which has been, for many decades, attempted and failed in the laboratory…Our citizens must first and foremost define the discussion in order to accurately weigh the choices…[We] have been given little information at all and that includes complete opacity of data on the unfolding outcomes of adverse reactions currently taking place.”^[x][Ilana Rachel Daniel, Arutz Sheva, Israel National News]

Pfizer seeks to obtain basic safety and efficacy information that it lacks, in order for its vaccine to be eligible for an FDA license. No vaccine has ever before been administered to millions of people without having met safety and efficacy requirements.

The following information must normally be obtained during controlled clinical trials prior to public distribution.

First, the company needs to demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in preventing infection when one is exposed to the virus.

Second, serious adverse effects need to be identified and their frequency and duration determined.

Third, the risk for specific populations, including children, pregnant women and the elderly need to be identified and weighed against the benefits.

Fourth, causes of deaths during the trial need to be documented.

Dr. Nachman Ash

On January 19, 2020, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that over 12,400 Israelis who had been vaccinated tested positive for Covid – that’s 56.6% of the 189,000 vaccinated people.

Dr. Nachman Ash, Israel’s national pandemic coordinator, warned on Army Radio that:

“Many people have been infected between the first and second injections of the vaccine. The protective effect appears “lower than we thought [and] lower than [the data] presented by Pfizer.”

He warned that restrictions will continue longer than expected. “With COVID-19 mutations, third lockdown may not be Israel’s last.”

Should pregnant women be exposed to a controversial, experimental vaccine?

The safety of the vaccine has not been adequately ascertained under Operation Warp Speed. It has never been tested in pregnant women.

On January 8^th the W.H.O. advised against vaccinating pregnant and breastfeeding women” “due to insufficient data, WHO does not recommend the vaccination of pregnant women at this time.”^[xi]

The C.D.C. issued conflicting advice:^[xii] The WHO came under pressure two days after the media reported the conflicting advice.^[xiii] Citing no new data, the WHO rescinded its cautionary guideline stating: “based on the data at hand, we don’t have any….reason to believe there are specific risks…”

However, the WHO continues to warn that data on Covid-19 vaccines and pregnancies is lacking, making safety assessments difficult.^[xiv]

Those who regard vaccines as a Holy Grail – throw caution to the wind. Have they forgotten the disastrous tragedies that followed when pregnant women were prescribed Thalidomide[xv] and Diethylistilbestrol (DES)?

Vaccine zealots disregard medicine’s precautionary “do no harm” principle before applying any invasive medical intervention. They blame the lack of data on the precaution against exposing expectant mothers to clinical trials.

Pfizer’s experiment in Israel will fill the gap. Dr. Ash has not only recommended the vaccine for pregnant women, he added pregnant Israeli women to the priority vaccination list.^[xvi]

“Biological Experiment” in Hebrew

“Biological Experiment”

Pregnant Israeli women have not been informed that the vaccine is experimental. Neither are they aware that they are being consigned – like rabbits – in a massive medical experiment without their informed consent.

Pfizer, the company to whom the Prime Minister and officials of the Department of Health entrusted to test its experimental vaccine on the entire population of Israel, is an unscrupulous business corporation with an extensive Rap Sheet compiled by Corporate Research Project.^[xvii]

Pfizer’s track record is filled with cases in which it was accused of misleading regulators and the public about the safety of its products.

One of the most notorious cases of criminal human rights violations involved Pfizer’s unapproved clinical trial conducted in Nigeria.

Pfizer enrolled 200 children to test its new, experimental antibiotic drug Trovan, deceiving parents by falsely claiming that it was an approved therapy for meningitis.

In fact, Pfizer sought to obtain data so that their drug could get an FDA approval; a process that should have taken at least a whole year (or longer) was rushed through in six weeks — much like the testing process for its Covid-19 vaccine was rushed.

The Trovan trial resulted in the death of eleven children, and twelve others were left permanently disabled. Two years later the FDA warned that the drug could cause liver damage and death.

The mass vaccination experiment is being conducted in violation of Israel’s legal ethics requirements; namely, review and approval by the Institutional Review Board / Ethics (Helsinki) Committee.^[xviii]

The Helsinki Committee approval is required for any research study involving human subjects and is also required for any deal by the Israeli government that provides citizens’ data to other entities, especially if they are foreign.

A senior official of the Helsinki Committee confirmed the “clear, unequivocal and unambiguous evidence that the contract with Pfizer is a clinical study”:

“Reading the contract signed between the Israeli government and Pfizer, it is clear, unequivocal and unambiguous that this is a clinical study for all intents and purposes, and thus, it needed to be approved by the Helsinki Committee. And that’s what will be written in the Committee’s opinion:
‘There’s nothing wrong with clinical trials, on the contrary, but clinical trials (human trials) must get committee approval, and of course, from the people on whom the trial is being conducted, while giving the right to refuse to be part of the trial. These are very basic matters.‘”^[xix]

Senior Israel Democracy Institute attorney Dr. Tehila Schwartz-Altshuler described: the experiment in Calcalist: “This is the most extensive study of human beings in the 21st century.

The experiment violates the Nuremberg Code;^[xx] the most important document in the history of medical research ethics standards. The foremost ethical principle of the Nuremberg Code is as relevant today as it was in 1947: “The voluntary, informed consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”
Informed consent is “absolutely essential” because it affirms the human right of the individual to accept or reject. Informed consent stands as a moral/legal barrier to ensure that governments “Never Again” pervert medicine.
“The right to refuse” a medical intervention is reaffirmed under the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights(2005) which states: “Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.”^[xxi]
Medicine is not like a commodity; medical decisions are personal, requiring the weighing of benefits against risks. Medicine often involves life and death decisions. Without informed consent of the individual, medicine can be, and has been, weaponized. Under Operation Warp Speed, the dangerously abbreviated clinical trials were far too short to document the scope or severity of vaccine adverse effects.

Risks of greatest concern from the experimental mRNA vaccines are described clearly in detail here.^[xxii]

Both vaccines are made from messenger RNA and lipid nanoparticles containing polyethylene glycol (PEG). Scientists believe PEG poses a risk of anaphylaxis ^[xxiii].

The risks include: severe allergic reactions, such as, anaphylaxis; systemic inflammatory response syndrome;^[xxiv]autoimmune disease;^[xxv] and antibody-dependent enhancement.

The latter is the focus of a recent peer reviewed report in the International Journal of Clinical Practice, by scientists from New York University and Tulane who warn that:

THE RISK OF ADE IN COVID‐19 VACCINES IS NON‐THEORETICAL AND COMPELLING
COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated.
The prior evidence that vaccine‐elicited, antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease is likely to occur to some degree with COVID‐19 vaccines is vertically consistent from controlled SARS studies in primates to clinical observations in SARS and COVID‐19.
Thus, a finite, non‐theoretical risk is evident in the medical literature that vaccine candidates composed of the SARS‐CoV‐2 viral spike and eliciting anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies, be they neutralising or not, place vaccinees at higher risk for more severe COVID‐19 disease when they encounter circulating viruses.

Timothy Cardozo, MD, PhD

Israel’s Health Ministry claims that it had obtained all required approvals; clearly this is not true.

The other major issue of concern is the violation of the right to PRIVACY.

The transfer of extensive, sensitive medical data to a multi-national foreign corporation exposes every Israeli citizen to extraordinary risks of harm. The most important commodity today is data. The transfer of its citizens’ medical data exposes the State of Israel to security risks.

Pfizer is one of the most unscrupulous business corporations whose court-adjudicated corrupt and illegal business practices includes numerous product safety violations, bribery in eight countries, and other crimes too numerous to be reviewed here.

A 27-year record of pharmaceutical company criminal and civil violations that led to settlements with U.S. state and federal government, was compiled by Public Citizen.^[xxvi] Pfizer has the dubious distinction of setting two records; Pfizer’s corrupt business practices resulted in the highest criminal fine in US history for $2.3 billion, and the largest civil fraud settlement of $1 billion.

This is the company to whom Prime Minister Netanyahu and Israel’s Department of Health entrusted with the data of its citizens’ personal medical records. That data contains a treasure trove of information that Pfizer might even sell to the highest bidder.

Attorney Tehila Schwartz-Altshuler

Attorney Tehila Schwartz-Altshuler of Israel Democracy Instituteexpressed serious concerns about the secret contractual provisions; which she strongly suspects, provide Pfizer with anonymized personal data of citizens’ medical records from which names, addresses and ID numbers are removed. However, she noted that:

“One of the crucial problems with the agreement is that although it acknowledges the need to preserve anonymity and privacy of Israelis, it does not outline steps to protect this principle…and there are loopholes, such as secondary uses of data. ”
“The problem is that technology today is so advanced that research has shown that even data that has been rendered anonymous can be “de-anonymized. [It is a] huge risk.”[xxvii]

Jonathan Klinger, a cyberlaw attorney and legal adviser for the Israeli Digital Rights Movement, a nonprofit group, agrees: “we don’t really know what’s being shared. Even if aggregated or anonymous data is transferred, it could be re-identified. This is still a concern.”

“Bibi feels that my health data belongs to him. If you give someone else or give away my medical records — which are the most sensitive kind of data that someone can know about me — you need my permission. Why didn’t you ask for my permission? Treating this personal data as if it belongs to the government is “not ethically, not legally and not morally right.”” [TSA]

The Helsinki Ethics Committee has yet to issue its ruling about the experiment and the transmission of personal health data to Pfizer without the specific agreement of every individual person who is a de facto subject.

Read the full article at AHRP.org.

SOURCE

Great Reset? Putin Says, "Not So Fast"

i Witness NEWS — Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:21:08 -0500

Great Reset? Putin Says, "Not So Fast"

BY TYLER DURDEN

THURSDAY, FEB 11, 2021 - 23:50

Authored by Tom Luongo via Gold, Goats, 'n Guns blog,

Did you happen to catch the most important political speech of the last six years?

It would have been easy to miss given everything going on. In fact, I almost did, and this speech sits at the intersection of nearly all of my areas of intense study.

The annual World Economic Forum took place last week via teleconference, what I’m calling Virtual Davos, and at this year’s event, of course, the signature topic was their project called the Great Reset.

But if the WEF was so intent on presenting the best face for the Great Reset to the world it wouldn’t have invited either Chinese Premier Xi Jinping or, more importantly, Russian President Vladimir Putin.

And it was Putin’s speech that brought down the house of cards that is the agenda of the WEF.

The last time someone walked into a major international forum and issued such a scathing critique of the current geopolitical landscape was Putin’s speech to the United Nations on September 29th, 2015, two days before he sent a small contingency of Russian air support to Syria.

There he excoriated not only the U.N. by name but most importantly the U.S. and its NATO allies by inference asking the most salient question, “Do you understand what you have done?” having unleashed chaos in an already chaotic part of the world?

As important as that speech was it was Putin’s actions after that which defined the current era of geopolitical chess across the Eurasian continent. Syria became the nexus around which the resistance to the “ISIS is invincible” narrative unraveled

And the mystery of who was behind ISIS, namely the Obama administration, was revealed to anyone paying attention.

President Trump may have taken credit for beating ISIS, but it was mostly Putin and Russia’s forces retaking the Western part of Syria which allowed that to happen, while our globalist generals, like James Mattis, did as much damage to Syria itself and as little to ISIS as possible, hoping to use them again another day.

And regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the U.S.’s policy in Syria, which I most definitely do not, it is hard to argue that Russia’s intervention there fundamentally changed the regional politics and conflicts for the foreseeable future.

It was the beginning of the voluntary disconnection of China, Russia and Iran from the West.

For standing athwart U.S. and European designs on consolidating power in the Middle East, Russia has been vilified in the West in ways that make the indoctrination I received as a kid growing up in the Cold War look like vacation advertisements for spending the summer in Crimea.

But it is that strength of purpose and character that has defined Putin’s two decades in power. He’s done wonders in rebuilding Russia.

He’s made many mistakes, mostly by first trusting American Presidents and second by underestimating just how arrogant and rapacious the leadership in Europe is.

That said, he’s now reached his limit, especially with Europe, and he’s set a firmly independent path for Russia regardless of the short-term costs.

And that’s why his speech at the World Economic Forum was so important.

Putin hadn’t spoken there for nearly a decade. In a time when WEF-controlled puppets dominate positions of power in Europe, the U.K., Canada and now the U.S., Putin walked into Virtual Davos and dumped his coffee on the carpet.

In terms I can only describe as unfailingly polite, Putin told Klaus Schwab and the WEF that their entire idea of the Great Reset is not only doomed to failure but runs counter to everything modern leadership should be pursuing.

Putin literally laughed at the idea of the Fourth Industrial Revolution – Schwab’s idea of a planned society through AI, robots and the merging of man and machine.

He flat-out told them their policies driving the middle class to the brink of extinction over the COVID-19 pandemic will further increase social and political unrest while also ensuring wealth inequality gets worse.

Putin’s no flower-throwing libertarian or anything, but his critique of the hyper-financialized post-Soviet era is accurate.

The era dominated by central banking and the continued merging of state and corporate powers has increased wealth inequality across the U.S. and Europe, benefiting millions while extracting the wealth of billions.

Listening to Putin was like listening to a cross between Pat Buchanan and the late Walter Williams. According to him the neoliberal ideal of “invite the world/invade the world” has destroyed the cultural ties within countries while hollowing out their economic prospects. Putin criticized zero-bound interest rates, QE, tariffs and sanctions as political weapons.

But the targets of those weapons, while nominally pointed at his Russia, were really the West’s own engines of vitality, as the middle classes have seen their wages stagnate, and access to education, medical care, and the courts to redress grievances fall dramatically.

Russia is a country on the rise, so is China. Once their ties are embedded deeply enough to stabilize its economy, so too will Iran rise.

Together they will lead the central Asian landmass out of the nineteenth-century quagmire that exists thanks to British and American intervention in the region. Putin’s speech made it clear that Russia is committed to the process of finding solutions to all people benefiting from the future, not just a few thousand holier-than-thou oligarchs in Europe.

In a less confrontational address, Chairman Xi said the same thing.

He gave lip service, like Putin, to climate change and carbon neutrality, focusing instead on pollution and sustainability.

Together they basically told the WEF to stuff the Great Reset back into the hole in which it was conceived.

I’ve followed Putin closely for nearly a decade now. I got the feeling that if he was speaking to a college-level political science class and not a convocation of some of the most powerful people in the world he would been laughed in their faces.

But, unfortunately, he understands better than any of us having been the object of their aggression for so long, he had to treat them seriously as their grasp of reality and connectedness to the people they ruled was nearly severed.

At the end of his planned remarks, Klaus Schwab asked Putin about Russia’s troubled relationship with Europe and could it be fixed. Putin pulled no punches.

If we can rise above these problems of the past and get rid of these phobias, then we will certainly enjoy a positive stage in our relations.
We are ready for this, we want this, and we will strive to make this happen. But love is impossible if it is declared only by one side. It must be mutual.

I don’t get the sense from anything I’ve seen from the Biden Administration or the European Commission in Brussels that anyone heard a word he said.

* * *

Join My Patreon if you don’t want to be forcibly Reset

Donate
BTC: 3GSkAe8PhENyMWQb7orjtnJK9VX8mMf7Zf
BCH: qq9pvwq26d8fjfk0f6k5mmnn09vzkmeh3sffxd6ryt
ETH: 0x1dd2e6cddb02e3839700b33e9dd45859344c9edc
DCR: DsV2x4kJ4gWCPSpHmS4czbLz2fJNqms78oE
DASH: XjWQKXJuxYzaNV6WMC4zhuQ43uBw8mN4Va
XMR: 48Whbhyg8TNXiNV2LNkjeuJJU55CNt5m1XDtP3jWZK2xf5GNsbU2ZwHLDJTQ5oTU3uaJPN8oQooRpSQ2CPMJvX8pVTqthmu

SOURCE ARTICLE ZEROHEDGE

"Putin told Klaus Schwab and the WEF that their entire idea of the Great Reset is not only doomed to failure but runs counter to everything modern leadership should be pursuing."

WATCH THE VIDEO

A Police Officer Speaks Out on behalf of Humanity

i Witness NEWS — Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:33:53 -0500

A Police Officer Speaks Out on Behalf of Humanity

Truth Beauty and Goodness vs Evil, Sin & Iniquity

Eline Ploeger Facebook Post

Partially copied:

An ex-ME and ex-detective writes,

read and think about what kind of country you want to live in...

Text: Yvonne Freespirit

I've thought about posting this for a long time, but finally decided to do so after the police / ME act yesterday at the Museumplein in Amsterdam.

For 25 years I myself worked with my heart and soul in this organization. From one of the first women in the ME to detective to surveillance service and everything in between.

I was so proud to get my education and start my service in Rotterdam. I could enjoy contact with the public intensely, in any sense. I learned very quickly that the way you treated people was also the way you were treated yourself. Whether this was a case of assistance or giving out a report. I've been through a wonderful time that I cherish to this day. Every day I came home with a feeling of pride. I felt like I could contribute a small part to a better society.

10 years ago I quit. I noticed that a change was being made that I was struggling with. I was forced to make decisions that I didn't support. Decisions that came from The Hague and not from the local mayor who knew so well what was going on in the city. Decisions that prevented me from being employed by those who needed it, but employed those with the greatest power and money. Of course the citizen was suffering from this. After some intense confrontations with executives, I decided to hang my uniform on the coat rack for good, and I didn't regret it for a day. In fact, a whole new world opened up for me, one in which I could be proud of myself!

During the whole *C thing I'm already doing research, apart from the information the Media provides. I quickly felt like something was wrong, because measures were conflicting with each other and the best journalists posted unilaterally.

And now today, (and during previous demonstrations).

There you are, with your helmet on, with protective clothing on, bulletproof vest, long barrel, handcuffs etc. Hiding behind your shield. You look out for yourself and see people who are destroyed by the measures, desperate, dealing with their bankrupt businesses, depressed children, parents who are no longer allowed to see them because they are locked up in their care home etc. People who have made long trips to make their voices heard together. A voice that made sure that YOU too could live in freedom.

Then what goes through you when you see that your presence is absolutely DISPROPORTIONAL in relation to the place where you are at that moment. There is no violence against you, there is no reason for you to be afraid of what is happening before your eyes, yet you stand there and

YOU FOLLOW A CONVENTION.

WITH WEAPEN STOLE HIGH, FORWARD, CHARGE!!!!!!!!

And there you go, you follow the command given and do what the authorities say you should. Clean sweep the entire square!

What then goes through you when an older person doesn't get away fast enough or a child left behind with agony in the eyes because of your performance. Because no ass should fall in the line, you decide to scare and punch these people. Full of adrenaline you push and slap on it or like there's a herd of unhinged hooligans facing you. Without regard to the person, you lift your long baton and beat the older man standing there with his daughter with the only weapon of their voice. Fathers had gone with children because they wanted to tell their children that FREEDOM is something you should never be taken away from.

What is going on in you, you under that helmet, together with your colleagues?

And then it's done, then you drive back to the station together with your colleagues. What are you talking about then? About the ordinary person standing there? Equal to your husband / wife / partner / child / parents / grandparents?

And then it's time to go home. You change clothes in the locker room and hang your uniform in the closet. You look in the mirror. Who do you see? What do you think?

Then you go home, to husband / wife / partner / children / parents and then they ask you how your day has been.

What do you say to them?

I only followed an order?

How long will you hide behind an order, when will the individual you are again?

The man / woman of flesh and blood who can be proud to provide help to those who need it?

My Comments. PBK

To Those in Uniform serving this day and generation.

Who among you are willing to sell your soul and an eternal adventure to obey an order from a principality of evil and a paycheck? You should fear not those who can kill the body but then have no more power over you, rather you should fear those whose orders and commands can destroy the human soul.

You Should Never forget these laws of relation to the Father's will:

148:4.3 "Evil is the unconscious or unintended transgression of the divine law, the Father's will. Evil is likewise the measure of the imperfectness of obedience to the Father's will.

148:4.4 "Sin is the conscious, knowing, and deliberate transgression of the divine law, the Father's will. Sin is the measure of unwillingness to be divinely led and spiritually directed.

148:4.5 "Iniquity is the willful, determined, and persistent transgression of the divine law, the Father's will. Iniquity is the measure of the continued rejection of the Father's loving plan of personality survival and the Sons' merciful ministry of salvation. http://mm.spiritualfamily.net/Urantia_Book-Online_Reader-2019/Paper_148.html#EVIL,_SIN,_AND_INIQUITY

"Though human beings differ in many ways, the one from another, before God and in the spiritual world all mortals stand on an equal footing. There are only two groups of mortals in the eyes of God: those who desire to do his will and those who do not. As the universe looks upon an inhabited world, it likewise discerns two great classes: those who know God and those who do not. Those who cannot know God are reckoned among the animals of any given realm. Mankind can appropriately be divided into many classes in accordance with differing qualifications, as they may be viewed physically, mentally, socially, vocationally, or morally, but as these different classes of mortals appear before the judgment bar of God, they stand on an equal footing; God is truly no respecter of persons. Although you cannot escape the recognition of differential human abilities and endowments in matters intellectual, social, and moral, you should make no such distinctions in the spiritual brotherhood of men when assembled for worship in the presence of God."

http://mm.spiritualfamily.net/Urantia_Book-Online_Reader-2019/Paper_133.html#133:0.3

WHAT GROUP OF MORTALS DO YOU STAND WITH.

God is Love

Beloved Miami obstetrician Gregory Michael, 56, died following a suspected catastrophic reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, DailyMail.com can reveal

i Witness NEWS — Thu, 07 Jan 2021 19:39:15 -0500

EXCLUSIVE: Wife of 'perfectly healthy' Miami doctor, 56, who died of a blood disorder 16 days after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is certain it was triggered by the jab, as drug giant investigates first death with a suspected link to shot

Beloved Miami obstetrician Gregory Michael, 56, died following a suspected catastrophic reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, DailyMail.com can reveal
Heidi Neckelmann says her husband was completely healthy until he had the jab on December 18 at Mount Sinai Medical Center
He succumbed this week to a stroke brought on by acute IDP - Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura - a blood disorder caused by a lack of platelets
IDP can be acute or chronic, lasting six months or more, striking on its own or in conjunction with other autoimmune conditions or certain cancers
Heidi insists, however, that her husband did not have an immune disorder or any similar condition that could have caused ITP
The mother-of-one said: 'In my mind his death was 100 percent linked to the vaccine. There is no other explanation'
She said: 'My husband had conversations with the doctors who said it was highly probable that the vaccine was the cause'
If his death is linked directly to the vaccine, Michael would be the first known case in the world of a person dying after the injection
A spokesman for Pfizer told DailyMail.com the firm was looking into Gregory's death but they did not believe it had any link to the vaccine

The grieving wife of a leading Florida doctor has told DailyMail.com how her ‘perfect’ husband died from a mystery blood disorder - just days after getting the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

Heidi Neckelmann says obstetrician Gregory Michael, 56 - her ‘best friend’ and partner of 28 years – was active, healthy and had no pre-existing conditions before getting the jab on December 18.

However he died from a stroke Sunday morning after suddenly developing a rare autoimmune illness that causes the body to destroy its own platelets, the tiny fragments that help blood to clot.

Distraught Heidi, 58, thinks the groundbreaking Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine may have somehow been the trigger.

‘In my mind his death was 100 percent linked to the vaccine. There is no other explanation,’ she told DailyMail.com, fighting back tears.

‘He was in very good health. He didn’t smoke, he drank alcohol once in a while but only socially. He worked out, we had kayaks, he was a deep sea fisherman.

‘They tested him for everything you can imagine afterwards, even cancer, and there was absolutely nothing else wrong with him.’

Pfizer told DailyMail.com Wednesday that it was aware of Dr. Michael's ‘highly unusual’ death and was investigating further.

However a spokesman cautioned: ‘We don’t believe at this time that there is any direct connection to the vaccine.’

Heidi Neckelmann says obstetrician Gregory Michael, 58, was completely healthy until he had the jab on December 18 at Mount Sinai Medical Center, where he works in Miami Beach

The mother-of-one said: 'In my mind his death was 100 percent linked to the vaccine. There is no other explanation.' Pictured: Dr. Michael with his wife Heidi and daughter

If his death is linked directly to the vaccine, Dr. Michael would be the first known case in the world of a person dying after having it. A spokesman for Pfizer told DailyMail.com the firm was looking into his death but they did not believe it had any link to the vaccine

Dad-of-one Gregory suffered no immediate reaction to the injection but three days later he was taking a shower and noticed petechiae - spots of red that indicate bleeding beneath the skin - on his feet and hands.

When he checked himself into Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, the hospital where he works and had the groundbreaking vaccine, medics discovered he was suffering from an acute lack of platelets.

‘All the blood results came back normal except for the platelets which came back as zero,’ Heidi said.

‘At first they thought it must be a mistake. So they did the test again and this time did a manual count which is supposed to be more accurate. This time it showed just one platelet.

‘He felt 100 percent, he was normal, energetic, happy. But they said you cannot go home, this is incredibly dangerous, you could suffer a brain bleed and die.’

Normally doctors would expect a range of between 150,000 to 450,000 platelets per microliter of blood.

Their primary function is to help the blood clot and prevent bleeding.

Heidi says doctors tried frantically to reverse what they diagnosed as an acute immune disorder known as ITP - idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.

In people with ITP, also known as severe thrombocytopenia, the immune system mistakes platelets for foreign objects and instructs the spleen to destroy them.

It can be acute or chronic, lasting six months or more, striking on its own or in conjunction with other autoimmune conditions, certain cancers or during pregnancy.

Kids can get ITP after a viral infection such as the flu or mumps, while in adults, triggers can include HIV, hepatitis or H. pylori, a type of bacteria that causes stomach ulcers.

Gregory’s wife insists, however, that had he none of these illnesses.

One solution to ITP is to remove the spleen but Heidi says he wasn’t a candidate because his blood wasn’t able to clot, making the operation too dangerous.

According to a harrowing account posted on his wife's Facebook, blood tests revealed the popular medic has a platelet count of zero

Neckelmann did not disclose any allergies or pre-existing conditions which may have contributed to her husband's death

After two weeks of infusions and experimental treatments that failed to raise Gregory’s platelet count, doctors decided they had no choice.

However he died from a hemorrhagic stroke - when blood from an artery bleeds into the brain - before he could undergo the surgery.

‘They gave him medicine. They gave him an incredible amount of platelet infusions, I’m told all the platelets in Miami Dade County,’ Heidi said.

‘But no matter what they did, nothing helped. The blood tests came back with zero platelets every time.

‘My husband had conversations with the doctors who said it was highly probable that the vaccine was the cause.

‘It seems possible to me that somehow it instructed his body to attack the wrong thing, the platelets.’

If Gregory’s fatal condition is traced directly back to the groundbreaking Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine, it would be the first known death linked to it.

The jab was heralded as an extraordinary breakthrough in the fight against Covid-19 after it was analyzed by global health bodies in record time and cleared for use in the US one week before Gregory had it.

Instead of a live virus, it uses mRNA, or messenger RNA, which is essentially a set of instructions which tells cells how to produce a spike protein, the same protein which is found on the surface of the coronavirus.

Dr. Gregory Michael was active, healthy and had no pre-existing conditions before getting the jab on December 18

This triggers the immune system to make antibodies against the spike protein so that if the real coronavirus enters the body it can be recognized and destroyed.

‘My husband had a few questions but he’s certainly not anti-vaccine,’ Heidi said. ‘He wanted to protect his patients and his family from Covid. He believed it would be safe.’

She met her husband 28 years ago when they were neighbors and he was in pre-med, about to embark on a successful career as an obstetrician.

Heidi was so smitten she immediately told friends ‘this is the man I’m going to marry.’

‘That’s exactly what happened, we fell in love, we were married for 21 years,’ she recalled, fighting back tears.

‘It was exactly as you see it in the movies, only that doesn’t normally happen in real life. I’m not just saying this because he is dead, but it was the perfect marriage. I cannot think of a time that we fought.

‘He was adored and loved by his patients. He delivered hundreds of healthy, beautiful babies. You have no idea how many texts I have received and the number of people calling me crying. He was just a special soul.’

Heidi said the couple’s 15-year-old daughter is struggling to comprehend that her doting father is gone.

‘They were both musicians. They would play the guitar together. They had the greatest connection ever,’ she added.

‘There is no way I am letting my daughter or anyone else in my family have the vaccine now, not until we know they have ironed out all the bugs and ensured that it’s safe.

‘I don’t want people to get sick from Covid and I’m not against vaccines but we need to slow things down.

‘They are giving this vaccine to some of the most important people, the doctors and nurses that take care of us, as well as the elderly, the most vulnerable.

‘As a doctor my husband would not have wanted anyone to take something that was not safe.’

Pfizer’s jab was licensed on December 11 for anyone aged 16 or older.

The FDA website warns of possible side effects lasting several days, including pain at the injection site, tiredness, headache, muscle pain, chills, joint pain, and fever.

Pfizer’s jab and another from Moderna are the only vaccines cleared for use in US and so far roughly 4.8 million doses have been administered.

Heidi said the couple's 15-year-old daughter is struggling to comprehend that her doting father is gone. 'They were both musicians. They would play the guitar together. They had the greatest connection ever,' she added. 'There is no way I am letting my daughter or anyone else in my family have the vaccine now, not until we know they have ironed out all the bugs and ensured that it's safe

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that, to date, only 21 people have suffered severe allergic reactions.

All of those patients are said to have recovered, thanks largely to emergency injections of epinephrine, often given via an EpiPen.

‘Right now, the known and potential benefits of the current Covid-19 vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks of getting Covid-19,’ Dr. Nancy Messonnier, head of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, told reporters Wednesday.

A spokesman for Pfizer said the company’s immediate thoughts were with the bereaved family.

‘Pfizer and BioNTech are aware of the death of a healthcare professional sixteen days after receiving a first dose of BNT162b2,’ the spokesman said.

‘It is a highly unusual clinical case of severe thrombocytopenia, a condition that decreases the body’s ability to clot blood and stop internal bleeding.

When Dr. Michael checked himself into Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, the hospital where he works and had the groundbreaking vaccine, medics discovered he was suffering from an acute lack of platelets

‘We are actively investigating this case, but we don’t believe at this time that there is any direct connection to the vaccine.

‘There have been no related safety signals identified in our clinical trials, the post-marketing experience thus far or with the mRNA vaccine platform.

‘To date, millions of people have been vaccinated and we are closely monitoring all adverse events in individuals receiving our vaccine.

‘It is important to note that serious adverse events, including deaths that are unrelated to the vaccine are unfortunately likely to occur at a similar rate as they would in the general population.’

A spokeswoman for Mount Sinai Medical Center said it was not possible to discuss individual patients.

‘Mount Sinai follows all protocols, guidelines and regulations from all governing agencies and strictly adheres to patient privacy laws and HIPAA guidelines. We cannot confirm or deny information about any patient,’ she said in a statement.

‘To the extent that we are aware of an incident involving any patient, the appropriate agencies are contacted immediately and have our full cooperation.

SOURCE ARTICLE

The Global Corona Crime Against Humanity: Science Against the Suicidal Death Cult

i Witness NEWS — Tue, 29 Dec 2020 22:12:52 -0500

The Global Corona Crime Against Humanity: Science Against the Suicidal Death Cult

Thomas Binder

Aktualisiert: vor 13 Stunden

Provisional version - work in progress Richie Allen Interview

The prevailing Corona Narrative:

A Stillborn eternal Undead

It is nonsense to test symptomatic people for one and only one respiratory virus. It is madness to do this with a hypersensitive RT-PCR test with Ct threshold >35 only without, in case of positivity, complementing highly specific confirmatory test because the detection of theoretically one SARS-CoV-2 RNA fragment does not prove an infection and certainly not a disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 or a death caused by COVID. Furthermore, anyone who dies within 28 days of a positive RT-PCR test of whatever cause is designated as "deceased WITH Corona", ostensibly for "international comparability". In my universe, these are not medical malpractices, but criminal acts. And it is the coronation of this already unbelievable insanity to (mass) test even asymptomatic persons in this naughtiness. By the way, the same utter madness can be created with any respiratory virus.

The contemporary human family, Homo sapiens, has been cohabiting successfully with respiratory viruses of the influenza, beta-corona and other families for about 300 000 years, our ancestors for much longer. If (mass) rapid tests, antisocial distancing, quarantine, isolation, contact tracing, masks in the public sphere, school closures and curfews aka lockdowns for asymptomatic persons, formerly called healthy people, were indispensable, we would have extinct millions of years ago. Instead, we call our amazing defence weapon against viruses that are dangerous to us the immune system. It has been perfected over millions of years. In mid-northern latitudes the "flu season" caused by these respiratory viruses starts in November.

Although they mutate permanently - because of their specially organised genome influenza viruses mutate more erratically than beta-corona viruses, the latter always in a way that they become more infectious while less dangerous because they do not "want" to kill us but to cooperate with us - only about 10% of the population fall ill with them each year because of innate / cross-immunity. The seasonal "flu wave" ends in April because of immunity, be it through infection or vaccination, of these approximately 10% susceptible people aka herd immunity. Finally, we learn in medical school that, for a respiratory virus to be spread relevantly by an infected person, there needs to be a pronounced replication of that virus, thus the infection of many body cells, which causes inflammation thus symptoms. The invention of the asymptomatic (super) spreader was another coronation of insanity in the prevailing corona narrative.

Whoever talks about intellectual absurdities like a "second wave" of a respiratory virus, which is a biological impossibility, or "herd immunity can only be achieved through vaccination", a factually false claim that lacks any scientific evidence and any common sense, or even wants to wage war against a respiratory virus, instantly exposes himself as either a totally deluded (by the media), a layperson, a lying psychopath, or a combination thereof.

The prevailing corona narrative was stillborn. Anybody who had called this out already in March was hushed up or defamed at best, brutally arrested by the anti-terrorist unit Argus apparently because unveiling the corona crime was perceived as a threat by some, at worst. As no legal offence was proven - an arrest warrant was never filed with good reason and my gun, that every former first lieutenant of the Swiss army owns, was found stored without ammunition at home for many years - I was psychiatrically detained because of "COVID madness" by a COVID-mad emergency internist. This erroneous decision was overturned by the administrative court of Aargau not before six days. According to the press release on the result of the report of the administrative investigation against the government of Aargau, which I have demanded yet not received despite two requests, the latter is nothing but a herd of innocent lambs.

Since then, many other scientists and doctors and I have confronted the infantile, absurd myths with the reality again and again, decently but firmly. We have persistently explained the unscientific, inhumane suicidal belief system of the death cult "Coronas Witnesses", which snatched away the therapy of the "flu wave" from us doctors and took over power almost globally in 2020. Because their belief system hovers in the fact-free vacuum, their faith leaders never dare to encounter in a scientific discourse, but censor and / or libel us themselves or by their puppet mouthpiece media and social media trolls as "crazed conspiracy theorists", "Nazis" and the like at best, attack us violently at worst. I will only mention a few recent realities here, which would have finished the stillborn eternal undead in a universe committed to scientificity aka reality, justice and humanness already a long time ago.

On May 13, John Ioannidis, Professor of medicine (Stanford Prevention Research), of epidemiology and population health and by courtesy, of statistics and of biomedical data science, submitted the study The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data for publication. This meta-analysis of 50 seroprevalence studies demonstrates an official IFR of COVID, meanwhile also accepted by the WHO, of 0.24% for the total population and of 0.04% for persons under 70 years. If we subtract those who died WITH not FROM COVID it is very likely ten times lower, at least, in the range of other beta corona cold viruses. Therefore, as well as the fact that the IFR of influenza is 0.1% to 0.3%, there is no reason to handle SARS-CoV-2 any differently than any other cold or flu virus. The prevailing corona narrative was finished for the second time.

On November 11, the “Tumori Journal” published the study Unexpected detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the prepandemic period in Italy. It demonstrates the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic persons in Italy as early as September 2019. SARS-CoV-2 has thus been endemic in Switzerland since the beginning of last year's "flu wave", at least. The exponential increase in the "case numbers of the first wave" of COVID was artificial due to an exponential increase in the number of persons (falsely) tested positive. Their decrease corresponded with the natural end of the last "flu season" due to immunity of the roughly 10% susceptible persons aka herd immunity. The prevailing corona narrative, including the totally overblown TV-PRopaganda shows from Wuhan and northern Italy, was finished for the third time. This is being hushed up.

On November 18, “Annals of Internal Medicine” published the study Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers, A Randomised Controlled Trial, also known as the "Danish RCT mask study". It shows no significant effect of wearing masks in the public sphere on the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The prevailing corona narrative was finished for the fourth time. This is being hushed up. Even worse, by ongoing orders to wear masks in the public sphere the populace is not only humiliated evermore, but still put at risk of catching bacterial and fungal pneumonia and even deceasing because of masks contaminated with bacteria and fungi. In particular, pulmonary aspergillosis, which is already common in COVID, is a life-threatening disease. Incidentally, the masks supplied to us doctors in Aargau from federal government stockpiles of the pre-pandemic reserve created in 2007 had been recalled, due to infestation with aspergillus fumigatus already before they were even used, three months after delivery in June.

On November 27, 22 international scientists and physicians (I am a co-author), including PCR geniuses, submitted the External peer review of the RT-PCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results of the Corman-Drosten paper Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR to the journal "Eurosurveillance". We list ten serious methodological errors: Vaguely flawed test design, inadequate primer design, excessive differences in annealing temperatures (gene sequences other than SARS-CoV-2 could also be detected), problematic inadequate RT-qPCR protocol, lack of standardisation, no definition of positive and negative test result, omission of a Ct threshold, failure to validate at the molecular level, lack of a positive control to assess sensitivity, and lack of a negative control to exclude detection of other (corona) viruses. In addition, two authors are members of the editorial board of "Eurosurveillance" that published the paper on 23 January after less than 24 hours of peer review (absolute world record). Finally, there are other conflicts of interest. With our request for retraction of the Corman-Drosten paper, which does not meet the minimum standards of scientificity by far, the basis of about 70% of the RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 carried out worldwide was exposed as useless - rolling a dice would be cheaper. The prevailing corona narrative based on this rapid test, in addition to the completely wrong indication to test, namely not only when there is need for specific antiviral therapy in severely ill hospitalised patients and in surveillance systems, was finished for the fifth time. This is being hushed up.

On December 14, “JAMA” published Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 54 studies on household transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The rate of asymptomatic transmission is 0.7% (95% CI: 0%-4.9%). Measures such as (mass) rapid tests, antisocial distancing, quarantine, isolation, contact tracing, masks in the public sphere, school closures and curfews aka lockdowns for asymptomatic persons, formerly called healthy people, are therefore preposterous and merely cause incredible psychological, physical, social, and economic harm. The prevailing corona narrative was finished for the sixth time. This is being hushed up.

Already a glance at Near-real time monitoring of intensive care occupancy (IES-Sytem) or Hospital capacities Switzerland immediately blows the lid off the current "second wave" of the global corona crime - a "second wave" of a respiratory virus is a biological impossibility. The prevailing corona narrative is finished for the seventh time. For this time of year, there are even an exceptional number of free hospital and ICU beds available. If there really were too few hospital and ICU beds locally or in Switzerland as a whole, this would not be the result of a respiratory virus, but of antisocial neoliberalism which meanwhile has also completely economised the health care system and thus made it inhumane, anyway. In the IES system one can also click on National Trends and then see the basis of the whole corona crime cristal clearly:

The Corman-Drosten rapid test - we have been waiting in vain for the review of our request for retraction of the Corman-Drosten paper that was “peer reviewed” in late January, when six out of about 1 400 000 000 people in China had died WITH SARS-CoV-2, in less than 24 hours since November 27 until today, when every additional minute of this corona insanity destroys countless lives worldwide - is fabricated so miserably that each country and almost every laboratory perform it differently and with far too high Ct threshold. In addition, the rate of false positive test results, which is already too high when no virus is present, increases massively during the "flu season" due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses. In the graphic on the right (see also cover of this blog), you can see how a positive RT-PCR test – rolling a dice would be cheaper - here on admission to hospital simply labels green "non-COVID-ICU patients" with the (often) wrong diagnosis COVID, i.e. in this case changes their colour to "yellow COVID-ICU patients". This swindle does not change the total number of ICU patients. Those responsible must have known this, otherwise they would not have reduced ICU capacities in Switzerland and worldwide since April, but would have increased them.

The origin of the almost global "corona crisis" is not only scientific malpractice. Even if the RT-PCR test was optimal, theoretically having a sensitivity and specificity of 100%, it is medical malpractice to use RT-qPCR and other rapid tests outside of need for specific antiviral therapy in severely ill hospitalised patients and of surveillance systems, to interpret their results without consideration of Ct value and the clinical context, and to largely ignore other respiratory pathogens that cause the same symptoms as COVID, first and foremost influenza.

How blind faith in a quick RT-PCR test can create a pseudo-epidemic or even a pseudo-pandemic was described in this New York Times article already in 2007:

“I had a feeling at the time that this gave us a shadow of a hint of what it might be like during a pandemic flu epidemic.”

"Yet, epidemiologists say, one of the most troubling aspects of the pseudo-epidemic is that all the decisions seemed so sensible at the time."

In summary: The corona crime is swine flu crime 2.0 and "Corona" mostly is Influenza 2.0: Rebranding.

An unbelievable number of self-interested people jump on this bandwagon into their supposed happiness, in reality always into the ruin of almost all of us, offered to them by a handful of conspirators, in order to increase their reputation and / or their power, and / or to make it ring in their coffers. This is precisely how every "banality of evil" is generated.

Every "banality of evil* is terminated when more and more small but important empathetic gear wheels in the "wheelwork of the wonderful good" become brave, interlock and eventually sweep away the "banality of evil", that works in the same manner but in the opposite direction, like a tsunami.

Almost everybody fell for the myth of a pandemic of a new corona killer virus. We have to apologise only if, once enlightened, we do not correct the course towards doom.

It is the responsibility of us doctors to follow our oath and to inform the public. It is the responsibility of the lawyers to restore justice.

Don't be afraid of mutations of influenza and beta-corona cold viruses. They mutate for ages and humanity does still exist. Be afraid of the mutations of many academicians, journalists, politicians, and show starlets that made them lackeys of multi-billionaire psychopaths!

I guess it is high time to finally overwhelm the persons mainly responsible for the global corona crime in Switzerland with lawsuits for scaring the populace and many more. This includes the federal and cantonal governments, the Federal Office of Public Health, the Swiss National COVID-19 Science Task Force, and the SRG, the Swiss public broadcaster that is notoriously violating the Radio-Television statute through disinformation and PRopaganda, but also many other self-serving collaborators. Allegedly they all do not have any clue about what terribly wrong they are doing. The evidence needed in court in any country can be found in this blog.

If the media’s spiral of silence is not broken very soon by a sufficient number of journalists, these obviously irresponsible people and non-effective life-threatening mRNA transfections aka "corona vaccines", which have not even been tested adequately in animal experiments - all corona vaccine developments have failed for about 20 years in "animal challenge studies" that apparently have never been carried out properly here - will lead us into our collective suicide before lawsuits will even be processed.

I wish us all a Merry Christmas and a more courageous New Year, and never forget: While a like is good for our ego, sharing is caring for humanity!

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

i Witness NEWS — Thu, 03 Dec 2020 16:42:22 -0500

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

By YANNI GU | November 22, 2020

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September.

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States.

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.

“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.

Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths.

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

This comes as a shock to many people. How is it that the data lie so far from our perception?

To answer that question, Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020. There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19. This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020, and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward.

Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.

“This is true every year. Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes,” Briand pointed out.

When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND

Graph depicts the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018.

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19.

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND

Graph depicts the total decrease in deaths by various causes, including COVID-19.

The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease.

“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.

In an interview with The News-Letter, Briand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases.

“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.

In other words, the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the U.S. is considered problematic only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes. Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same, one can hardly say, in Briand’s view, that COVID-19 deaths are concerning.

Briand also mentioned that more research and data are needed to truly decipher the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States.

Throughout the talk, Briand constantly emphasized that although COVID-19 is a serious national and global problem, she also stressed that society should never lose focus of the bigger picture — death in general.

The death of a loved one, from COVID-19 or from other causes, is always tragic, Briand explained. Each life is equally important and we should be reminded that even during a global pandemic we should not forget about the tragic loss of lives from other causes.

According to Briand, the over-exaggeration of the COVID-19 death number may be due to the constant emphasis on COVID-19-related deaths and the habitual overlooking of deaths by other natural causes in society.

During an interview with The News-Letter after the event, Poorna Dharmasena, a master’s candidate in Applied Economics, expressed his opinion about Briand’s concluding remarks.

“At the end of the day, it’s still a deadly virus. And over-exaggeration or not, to a certain degree, is irrelevant,” Dharmasena said.

When asked whether the public should be informed about this exaggeration in death numbers, Dharmasena stated that people have a right to know the truth. However, COVID-19 should still continuously be treated as a deadly disease to safeguard the vulnerable population.

Tags: science-technology

NOTE: The same statistics are also true in Canada. No increase in normal deaths per year. Facts don't lie but sometimes the so called Experts DO. Covid 19 is the greatest Fraud and Hoax ever committed in the history of this world. You should ask yourself then. WHAT IS THE REAL MOTIVE??? And find an honest answer before they kill off a major percentage of the human population by destroying businesses, industries, food supplies and supply chains.

NOTE THAT 2018 DEATHS ARE HIGHER THAN 2020

FIND OUT MORE ABOUT WHATS REALLY HAPPENING

Please consider making a donation to WayBackMachine that has preserved this important study from deletion and censorship by those actually committing these crimes against humanity. These records will be necessary to bring them into our courtrooms and charge them for this massive attempt at world domination via Political Tyranny, Economic Slavery and a Totalitarian Police State.

An Evidence Based Scientific Analysis of Why Masks are Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Harmful PAGE 3 OF 3

i Witness NEWS — Mon, 02 Nov 2020 13:10:06 -0500

An Evidence Based Scientific Analysis of Why Masks are Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Harmful

PAGE 3 OF 3

13. Masks collect and colonize viruses, bacteria, and mold.

In Germany, where schools are open and masks are mostly optional, the association of "Kinder f.Weltfrieden eV" commissioned a laboratory analysis to investigate the level of microbial contamination that results after a fresh mask is worn by a child for 6-8 hours in school. What they found was alarming to all those recommending we mask our children for several hours every day. The masks were found to be contaminated with 82 bacterial colonies and 4 mold colonies. Where do you think the bacteria, molds, and viruses progressively colonizing and growing on the warm moist mask-mouth interface end up?

Many of the microbes get transferred to surfaces the child (or adult) touches after they touch, fiddle, and mishandle their mask. This is one of the many reasons that masks are almost certainly INCREASING the transmission of infectious disease. More dangerously, these microbes are being inhaled and delivered deep into the lungs where respiratory disease far worse than CoVID-19 can result.

The oxygen lowering effects of masks forces the body to compensate by increasing heart rate and deepening inspirations (increasing tidal volumes). Increased tidal volumes drives the mask pathogens deep into the lungs where they can cause serious pneumonia, inflammation, and tissue damage.

Furthermore, these risks are compounded by the immune suppression (CD4+ T-cell suppression) that results from diminished arterial oxygenation. Thus, the mask-wearing child is at imminent risk for harm caused by lung infections that are far more dangerous than a CoVID-19 infection.

In fact, based on reports from my colleagues in emergency medicine, pulmonology, and infectious disease, an alarming explosion in bacterial pneumonias is being reported at ERs and urgent care centers across the country.

Evidence that supports the points above:

Zhiqing, Liu, Chang Yongyun, Chu Wenxiang, Yan Mengning, Mao Yuanqing, Zhu Zhenan, Wu Haishan, et al. 2018. “Surgical Masks as Source of Bacterial Contamination during Operative Procedures.” Journal of Orthopaedic Translation 14 (July): 57–62.
- This study investigated whether surgical masks (SMs) could be a potential source of bacterial shedding leading to an increased risk of surgical site infection.
- Results: The longer the operating time the more bacterial colonization occurred. A significant increase [in bacterial counts] was noted in the 2-hour group.
Colleen Huber, NMD, “Masks Are Neither Effective nor Safe,” PrimaryDoctor.Org, July 6, 2020. https://www.primarydoctor.org/masks-not-effect
- “The foregoing data show that masks serve more as instruments of obstruction of normal breathing, rather than as effective barriers to pathogens. Therefore, masks should not be used by the general public, either by adults or children, and their limitations as prophylaxis against pathogens should also be considered in medical settings.”
- Dr. Huber’s article cites 42 supporting scientific studies.
“Dr. Jenny Harries, England's deputy chief medical officer, has warned that it was not a good idea for the public to wear face masks as the virus can get trapped in the material and causes infection when the wearer breathes in.”
- Angela Betsaida B. Laguipo, BSN, “Reusing Masks May Increase Your Risk of Coronavirus Infection, Expert Says,” News, Medical, Life Sciences, March 15, 2020. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200315/Reusing-masks-may-increase-your-risk-of-coronavirus-infection-expert-says.aspx
See also, Melkorka Licea, “Mask Mouth” Is a Seriously Stinky Side Effect of Wearing Masks. New York Post, August 5, 2020. https://nypost.com/2020/08/05/mask-mouth-is-a-seriously-stinky-side-effect-of-wearing-masks/
Consider this: Health department investigating after high number of strep throat cases reported at Shepherd schools.

The Central Michigan District Health Department is investigating after more than a dozen cases of strep throat were reported within Shepherd Public Schools despite COVID-19 protocols.

14. Wearing a face mask makes the exhaled air (respiratory plumes) go into the eyes.

Masks may capture respiratory jets and large respiratory droplets, but they cannot prevent the respiratory plumes composed of aerosolizable respiratory droplet nuclei to escape the top, bottom, and sides of the masks.
The respiratory plume wafts into the eyes and generates an uncomfortable feeling and compulsion to touch and rub the eyes. If your hands are contaminated and you touch or rub your eyes, you are transmitting and infecting yourself through the ocular mucosa.[R]

15. Contact tracing studies show that asymptomatic carrier transmission is very rare.

Asymptomatic carriers are not a major driver of the disease.[R]
Therefore, one of the key reasons the public was told to wear masks, asymptomatic spreaders, should not be used as a reason for community wearing of masks.

16. Face masks and stay at home orders prevent the development of herd immunity.

Only herd immunity can prevent pandemics; it is the only thing that ever has.
Only herd immunity will protect the vulnerable members of society.
Sweden’s example continues to prove this point.

17. Face masks are dangerous and contraindicated for a large number of people with pre-existing medical conditions and disabilities.

Large percentages of the population have medical conditions that make wearing a mask dangerous. Individuals should be examined by a medical professional to ensure that mask wear will not further compromise their medical condition.
- Children with asthma (7.5% of American children) and other respiratory disabilities are being harmed by mask mandates, they are being discriminated against by businesses, schools, and public spaces that require masks.
- Children with autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders are extremely prone to agitation and severe anxiety that results from the adverse effects, e.g., oxygen lowering effects, of masks.
- An ever increasing number of children and young adults with autism are sensitive to touch and texture.[R] Covering the nose and mouth with fabric can cause sensory overload, feelings of panic, and extreme anxiety.
If a person with a disability is not able to wear a face mask, state and local government agencies and private businesses must consider reasonable modifications to a face mask policy so that the person with the disability can participate in, or benefit from, the programs offered or goods and services that are provided. A reasonable modification means changing policies, practices, and procedures, if needed, to provide goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations to an individual with a disability.
Examples of a person with a disability who might not be able to wear a face mask include individuals with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or other respiratory disabilities may not be able to wear a face mask because of difficulty in or impaired breathing. People with respiratory disabilities should consult their own medical professional for advice about using face masks.
The CDC also states that anyone who has trouble breathing should not wear a face mask.[R]
People with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), severe anxiety, or claustrophobia (an abnormal fear of being in enclosed or narrow places), may feel afraid or terrified when wearing a face mask. These individuals may not be able to stay calm or function when wearing a face mask.
A person who has cerebral palsy may have difficulty moving the small muscles in the hands, wrists, or fingers. Due to their limited mobility, they may not be able to tie the strings or put the elastic loops of a face mask over the ears. This means that the individual may not be able to put on or remove a face mask without assistance.
A person who uses mouth control devices such as a sip and puff to operate a wheelchair or assistive technology, or uses their mouth or tongue to use assistive ventilators will be unable to wear a mask.

Masking School Children is Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Harmful

Face masks are not only ineffective, they are more dangerous than parents are being told. Scientific study after scientific study over the course of many years have concluded that wearing face masks for extended periods of time puts the wearer, especially children, in imminent risk of physical and psychological harms.

If the previous section (“Masks are Harmful”) did not serve to make you question much of what you have heard about the risks of medical masks, let us now examine what the science and experts say about masking children.

Mandatory masks in school are a ‘major threat’ to children’s development, doctors warn

Wednesday, 09 September 2020
The face mask requirement at school is bad for children’s general well-being and should be abolished, 70 doctors wrote in an open letter to Flemish Education Minister Ben Weyts.
The doctors want [Flemish Education Minister] Weyts to immediately reverse his approach: no face mask requirement at school, only protect the at-risk group and only advise people with a possible risk profile to consult their doctor.
“In recent months, the general well-being of children and young people has come under severe pressure,” the letter’s authors said. “We see in our practices an increasing number of children and young people with complaints due to the rules of conduct that have been imposed on them.”
The doctors mentioned anxiety and sleep problems as well as behavioural disorders and germaphobia, which is a pathological fear of germs. They are also seeing an increase in domestic violence, isolation and deprivation.
“Mandatory face masks in schools are a major threat to their development. It ignores the essential needs of the growing child. The well-being of children and young people is highly dependent on emotional attachment to others,” they wrote.
According to them, “the face mask requirement makes school a threatening and unsafe environment, where emotional closeness becomes difficult.”
Moreover, “there is no large-scale evidence that wearing face masks in a non-professional environment has any positive effect on the spread of viruses, let alone on general health. Nor is there any legal basis for implementing this requirement.”
“Meanwhile, it is clear that healthy children living through Covid-19 heal without complications as standard and that they subsequently contribute to the protection of their fellow human beings by increasing group immunity”.
“The only sensible measure to prevent serious illness and mortality caused by Covid-19 is to isolate individual teachers and individual children at increased risk,” they said.
“This risk assessment is not the task of the Ministry of Education,” the doctors underlined, “but the task of the treating physicians in consultation with their patients.”
- From The Brussels Times

The Great Barrington Declaration

A letter authored by 3 top epidemiologists and professors on October 4 th, 2020, has, as of 6:00 pm, October 9th, 2020, been signed by 4,051 Medical & Public Health Scientists and 7,247 Medical Practitioners. This is a portion of their consensus declaration:

"As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.”

Thus, "The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection."

Read the letter in full: https://gbdeclaration.org/

Forcing Children to Wear Face Masks is Unnecessary

Forcing children to wear face masks in school is ineffective, harmful, and unnecessary. The risk of CoVID-19 in children is so low (see, “Masks are Unnecessary” above) that any imagined benefits cannot possibly outweigh the risks. Based on CDC data, the risk of children between the ages of zero and 19 years of age dying from CoVID-19 is an incredibly low risk of 0.00195%. This rate is much lower than the risk of children dying from influenza.

In fact, there is a large and growing body of physicians, pediatricians, scientists, epidemiologists, and researchers around the world that are speaking out against the anti-scientific public health recommendations that have been forced upon the public and our children.[R] Those of us that have read the science have concluded that it is senseless and dangerous to force children to wear face masks in school:

See e.g., Michelle Science MD, MSc, FRCPC, et. al., COVID-19: Guidance for School Reopening, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Hospital for Sick Children (“Sick Kids”), University of Toronto, Canada. https://www.sickkids.ca/PDFs/About-SickKids/81407-COVID19-Recommendations-for-School Reopening-SickKids.pdf
- The use of [Non-Medical Masks (“NMMs”)] in the school setting should be driven by local epidemiology with age-specific considerations.
- When transmission in the community is low, the use of NMMs throughout the entire school day should not be mandatory for elementary, middle or high school students returning to school.
- Safe masking practices (e.g. proper wearing/storage/removal) should be reinforced with educational materials provided to parents, students and teachers.
- Given the current epidemiology, the use of NMMs is not recommended for elementary school students.
A Covid-19 cross-country study by the University of East Anglia in England found that a mask requirement was of no benefit and could even increase the risk of infection.
- Hunter, et al., Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID- 9 in Europe: a quasi-experimental study, May 6, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.01.20088260
- “We found that closure of education facilities, prohibiting mass gatherings and closure of some non-essential businesses were associated with reduced incidence whereas stay at home orders, closure of all non-businesses and requiring the wearing of face masks or coverings in public was not associated with any independent additional impact.”

Forcing Children to Wear Face Masks for Long Periods Risks Causing Them Physical Injuries.

The topic of the physical harms caused by masks was covered previously, but it is worth repeating a few of the key points:

Wearing a mask for more than a few minutes causes a significant reduction in a person’s blood oxygen level.

See A. Beder, et al., Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery, Neurocirugía (2008). http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/neuro/v19n2/3.pdf
Transcranial Ultrasound Doppler (TCUD) studies on masked and unmasked individuals demonstrate the changes in blood flow in the brain the result from the arterial CO2 elevation that occurs within seconds of donning a mask.

This video demonstrates the use of TCUD and heart rate variability to measure the adverse effects of masking a healthy nine year old child: https://bit.ly/2GGQWiZ

Wearing masks for extended periods increased incidences of headaches and negatively affected work performance.

See Jonathan J.Y. Ong, et al., Headaches Associated With Personal Protective Equipment – A Cross‐Sectional Study Among Frontline Healthcare Workers During COVID‐19, Headache, the Journal of Head and Face Pain (May 2020). https://headachejournal.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/head.13811

Most children wear cloth masks.

See Brittany Dionne, How hard is it to find a medical grade face mask?, WBRC News, April 18, 2020. https://www.wbrc.com/2020/04/18/how-hard-is-it-find-medical-grade-face-mask/

But wearing a cloth mask may increase the risk of contracting Covid-19 and other respiratory infections.

See MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, et al., A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers, BMJ Open 2015; 5: e006577, US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577, April 22, 2015. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/pdf/bmjopen-2014-006577.pdf
- “This study is the first [Randomly Controlled Trial] of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks.
- This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”

Forcing Children to Wear Face Masks for Long Periods Risks Causing Them Mental and Psychological Injuries

Children are at risk for psychological trauma in multiple ways by being forced to wear face masks all day long at school. Doctors from around the country warn of the dangers to children of wearing face masks all day.

See e.g., Jeffrey I. Barke, M.D., Open the schools without politics, American Thinker, June 10, 2020. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/06/open_the_schools_without_politics.html

Mandatory face coverings on children is very harmful to the child: learning is inhibited; critical interactions among students and between student and teacher are fractured; and the face covering is counterproductive, as kids will naturally touch their faces, thereby contaminating their covering. This new normal that many are advocating may well lead to a spike in childhood behavior problems such as learning disabilities, anxiety disorders, and depression, to name a few.

See also Kathleen M. Pike, PhD, Why a Mask is Not Just a Mask, Global Mental Health Programs, Columbia University, April 17, 2020. https://www.cugmhp.org/five-on-friday/why-a-mask-is-not-just-a-mask

Many young children burst into tears or recoil when someone wearing a mask approaches. It’s so common that some elementary schools prohibit masks at the school Halloween parade. One reason for this is that the development of facial recognition is relatively weak in young children. According to University of Toronto psychologist, Dr. Kang Lee, it is not until kids are about 14 years old that they reach adult skill levels in recognizing faces. Before then, kids tend to see individual facial features, rather than recognizing the person as a whole. By putting on masks, we take away information that makes it especially difficult for children to recognize others and read emotional signals, which is unsettling and disconcerting. These issues may be especially true for children with autism spectrum disorder, including Asperger’s syndrome, who tend to have particular difficulties reading non-verbal cues.

Dr. Alice Kuo, President of the Southern California chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a statement criticizing Los Angeles County school reopening guidelines that require children wear masks as “not realistic or even developmentally appropriate for children.” She explained that, “wearing masks throughout the day can hinder language and socio-emotional development, particularly for younger children.”

Local Pediatricians Urge Collaborative Decision-Making About Reopening Schools, Southern California chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, June 2, 2020. http://aapca2.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/AAP-CA2-press-release-on-schools-re-opening 6-2-20-Rev.pdf

Some of the serious psychological harms to children caused by extended mask wearing are tied to lack of facial and emotional recognition.

See Christiane Bormann-Kischkel, Face Recognition in Children, Eur Arch Psychiatr Neurol Sci (1986) 236: 17-20. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00641052

The use of salient visual speech cues is hidden by masks making learning difficult for young children.

Kaylah Lalondea and Rachael Frush Holta, Preschoolers Benefit From Visually Salient Speech Cues, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 58, 135–150, February 2015. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712850/pdf/JSLHR-58-135.pdf
see also Martin Wegrzyn , et al., Mapping the emotional face. How individual face parts contribute to successful emotion recognition, PLoS ONE 12(5): e0177239, May 11, 2017. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177239
Lawrence Brancazio et al., Use of visual information in speech perception: Evidence for a visual rate effect both with and without a McGurk effect, Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67 (5), 759-769. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16334050/
Mustapha Skhiri, Visual Cues in Speech Perception, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, GSLT, LiTH 20001/3/02. http://www.speech.kth.se/~rolf/gslt_papers/MustaphaSkiri.pdf

Voices of teachers and other students muffled through face masks makes learning more difficult, especially for any child with a diagnosed or undiagnosed hearing impairment.

See Amanda B. Silberer, PhD, et al., Importance of High Frequency Audibility on Speech Recognition With and Without Visual Cues in Listeners with Normal Hearing, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders The University of Iowa, March 2014. https://haar.lab.uiowa.edu/sites/haar.lab.uiowa.edu/files/wysiwyg_uploads/silberer_bentler_wu_aas _2014.pdf

The Center for Disease Control (“CDC”) has made clear that “Schools are an important part of the infrastructure of communities and play a critical role in supporting the whole child, not just their academic achievement.”

See Preparing K-12 School Administrators for a Safe Return to School in Fall 2020. Guidance from the CDC to school Districts. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schools-childcare/prepare-safe return.html
Nowhere in the guidance provided to local schools by the CDC is any information about compelling students to wear face masks. In fact, the CDC acknowledges that “[m]ore research and evaluation is needed on the implementation of mitigation strategies (e.g., social distancing, masks, hand hygiene, and use of cohorting) used in schools to determine which strategies are the most effective.” Id. at 5.

The lack of any such recommendation is understandable given that the great weight of scientific evidence shows unmistakably that wearing face masks for extended periods is harmful to people’s health, safety and emotional well-being, especially to young children.

◄SOURCE ARTICLE►